Nature commodification: ‘a necessary evil’? An analysis of the views of environmental professionals on ecosystem services-based approaches

Julia Martin-Ortega, M Azahara Mesa-Jurado*, Mariana Pineda-Vazquez, P Novo

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Ecosystem services (ES) has established itself as the predominant paradigm for framing environmental research and policy-making. Its rapid popularisation is raising concerns about the possibility that it might lead to nature commodification. These concerns have been associated with a broader agenda for the neoliberalization of conservation, but research on this area remains mostly theoretical. This paper advances the debate with an empirical study on the views of environmental professionals. The views of those who shape interpretation, uptake and implementation environmental practice are of critical importance since they give the real mark on whether any fundamental change in the current direction of environmental governance is to be expected. Using Mexico as an exemplar case of a country in which ES have clearly entered the environmental discourse provides a forewarning of what might happen more broadly. Results indicate that, while acknowledging risks of commodification, environmental professionals consider a greater risk ‘missing out’ on opportunities to internalize ES monetary values in an economic growth-oriented context. They seem to see negative side-effects as ‘necessary evils’ to achieve conservation targets. Any substantial change in environmental governance is more likely to occur due to the disenchantment produced by the lack of impact of ES-based approaches in practice than of fears of commodification.
Original languageEnglish
Article number100926
Number of pages11
JournalEcosystem Services
Volume37
Early online date25 Apr 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPrint publication - Jun 2019

Fingerprint

Commodification
environmental assessment
ecosystem service
ecosystem services
Ecosystem
environmental governance
conservation
Environmental Policy
governance
environmental research
popularization
Economic Development
Policy Making
Mexico
fearfulness
economic development
policy making
Research
environmental policy
Fear

Keywords

  • Conservation
  • Market-based environmentalism
  • Mexico
  • Neoliberalism
  • Payments for ecosystem services
  • Valuation

Cite this

@article{db6d506444f94dcd959f14a2d1fd889a,
title = "Nature commodification: ‘a necessary evil’? An analysis of the views of environmental professionals on ecosystem services-based approaches",
abstract = "Ecosystem services (ES) has established itself as the predominant paradigm for framing environmental research and policy-making. Its rapid popularisation is raising concerns about the possibility that it might lead to nature commodification. These concerns have been associated with a broader agenda for the neoliberalization of conservation, but research on this area remains mostly theoretical. This paper advances the debate with an empirical study on the views of environmental professionals. The views of those who shape interpretation, uptake and implementation environmental practice are of critical importance since they give the real mark on whether any fundamental change in the current direction of environmental governance is to be expected. Using Mexico as an exemplar case of a country in which ES have clearly entered the environmental discourse provides a forewarning of what might happen more broadly. Results indicate that, while acknowledging risks of commodification, environmental professionals consider a greater risk ‘missing out’ on opportunities to internalize ES monetary values in an economic growth-oriented context. They seem to see negative side-effects as ‘necessary evils’ to achieve conservation targets. Any substantial change in environmental governance is more likely to occur due to the disenchantment produced by the lack of impact of ES-based approaches in practice than of fears of commodification.",
keywords = "Conservation, Market-based environmentalism, Mexico, Neoliberalism, Payments for ecosystem services, Valuation",
author = "Julia Martin-Ortega and Mesa-Jurado, {M Azahara} and Mariana Pineda-Vazquez and P Novo",
year = "2019",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1016/j.ecoser.2019.100926",
language = "English",
volume = "37",
journal = "Ecosystem Services",
issn = "2212-0416",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

Nature commodification: ‘a necessary evil’? An analysis of the views of environmental professionals on ecosystem services-based approaches. / Martin-Ortega, Julia; Mesa-Jurado, M Azahara; Pineda-Vazquez, Mariana; Novo, P.

In: Ecosystem Services, Vol. 37, 100926, 06.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Nature commodification: ‘a necessary evil’? An analysis of the views of environmental professionals on ecosystem services-based approaches

AU - Martin-Ortega, Julia

AU - Mesa-Jurado, M Azahara

AU - Pineda-Vazquez, Mariana

AU - Novo, P

PY - 2019/6

Y1 - 2019/6

N2 - Ecosystem services (ES) has established itself as the predominant paradigm for framing environmental research and policy-making. Its rapid popularisation is raising concerns about the possibility that it might lead to nature commodification. These concerns have been associated with a broader agenda for the neoliberalization of conservation, but research on this area remains mostly theoretical. This paper advances the debate with an empirical study on the views of environmental professionals. The views of those who shape interpretation, uptake and implementation environmental practice are of critical importance since they give the real mark on whether any fundamental change in the current direction of environmental governance is to be expected. Using Mexico as an exemplar case of a country in which ES have clearly entered the environmental discourse provides a forewarning of what might happen more broadly. Results indicate that, while acknowledging risks of commodification, environmental professionals consider a greater risk ‘missing out’ on opportunities to internalize ES monetary values in an economic growth-oriented context. They seem to see negative side-effects as ‘necessary evils’ to achieve conservation targets. Any substantial change in environmental governance is more likely to occur due to the disenchantment produced by the lack of impact of ES-based approaches in practice than of fears of commodification.

AB - Ecosystem services (ES) has established itself as the predominant paradigm for framing environmental research and policy-making. Its rapid popularisation is raising concerns about the possibility that it might lead to nature commodification. These concerns have been associated with a broader agenda for the neoliberalization of conservation, but research on this area remains mostly theoretical. This paper advances the debate with an empirical study on the views of environmental professionals. The views of those who shape interpretation, uptake and implementation environmental practice are of critical importance since they give the real mark on whether any fundamental change in the current direction of environmental governance is to be expected. Using Mexico as an exemplar case of a country in which ES have clearly entered the environmental discourse provides a forewarning of what might happen more broadly. Results indicate that, while acknowledging risks of commodification, environmental professionals consider a greater risk ‘missing out’ on opportunities to internalize ES monetary values in an economic growth-oriented context. They seem to see negative side-effects as ‘necessary evils’ to achieve conservation targets. Any substantial change in environmental governance is more likely to occur due to the disenchantment produced by the lack of impact of ES-based approaches in practice than of fears of commodification.

KW - Conservation

KW - Market-based environmentalism

KW - Mexico

KW - Neoliberalism

KW - Payments for ecosystem services

KW - Valuation

U2 - 10.1016/j.ecoser.2019.100926

DO - 10.1016/j.ecoser.2019.100926

M3 - Article

VL - 37

JO - Ecosystem Services

JF - Ecosystem Services

SN - 2212-0416

M1 - 100926

ER -