Abstract
Recent literature on no-till is reviewed with particular emphasis on research on commercial uptake and
environmental concerns in northern, western and south-western Europe. Increased interest in no-till,
and minimum or reduced tillage, results from changes in the economic circumstances of crop
production, the opportunity to increase the area of more profitable autumn-sown crops and increased
concern about environmental damage associated with soil inversion by ploughing. Highly contrasting
soil and climate types within and between these regions exert a strong influence on the success of no-till.
While no-till may often result in crop yields which equal or exceed those obtained after ploughing,
modest reductions in yield may be tolerated if production costs are lower than with ploughing. The
relative costs of fuel and herbicides have changed appreciably in recent years making no-till more
attractive commercially. While effective weed control is an essential aspect of no-till, current herbicide
technology may not yet fully achieve this.
In northern regions no-till usually allows earlier drilling of winter-sown crops but will give lower soil
temperature and higher moisture content in spring, causing delayed drilling of spring-sown crops. Notill
soils have greater bulk density and bearing capacity than ploughed soils with a pronounced vertical
orientation of macroporosity allowing penetration of roots and water, especially in view of the increased
population of deep-burrowing earthworms. Particular care must be taken with no-till to minimise soil
damage at harvest and to ensure the even distribution of crop residues prior to drilling.
Reduced erosion and runoff after adoption of no-till are widely observed and are of particular
importance in southwestern Europe. No-till reduces losses of phosphorus in runoff and, in some cases,
reduces the loss of nitrate through leaching. Emissions of greenhouse gases CO2 and N2O from no-till
soils are highly variable and depend on complex interactions of soil properties. Emission of CO2 from fuel
during machinery usage is always appreciably reduced with no-till. Increased soil organic carbon in
surface layers of no-till soils is widely found but may not be associated with increased carbon
sequestration throughout the profile. The evaluation of the relative carbon balance for no-till and
ploughing depends upon complex inter-relationships between soil and climate factors which are as yet
poorly understood. Adoption of no-till could be encouraged by government financial assistance in
recognition of environmental benefits, although future restrictions on the use of herbicides may be a
deterrent. Opportunities for further research on no-till are outlined.
2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 66 - 87 |
Number of pages | 22 |
Journal | Soil and Tillage Research |
Volume | 118 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | First published - 2012 |
Bibliographical note
62700032Keywords
- Direct drilling
- No-till
- Northern Europe
- Ploughing
- South-western Europe
- Western Europe
- Zero tillage