Perception vs practice: Farmer attitudes towards and uptake of IPM in Scottish spring barley

S Stetkiewicz, A Bruce, FJ Burnett, RA Ennos, CFE Topp

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    3 Citations (Scopus)
    10 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    Integrated Pest Management (IPM) offers a suite of ways by which to reduce the need for pesticide use, thus minimising environmental damage and pathogen resistance build-up in crop production. Farmers and agronomists active in the Scottish spring barley sector were surveyed to determine the extent to which they currently use or are open to implementing three IPM measures – varietal disease resistance, crop rotation, and forecasting disease pressure – in order to control three important fungal diseases. Overall, the survey results demonstrate that farmers and agronomists are open to using the three IPM techniques. However, gaps between actual and perceived recent practice were large: despite over 60% of farmers stating that they sowed varieties highly resistant to Rhynchosporium or Ramularia, less than one third of reportedly sown varieties were highly resistant to these diseases. Similarly, over 80% of farmers indicated that they used crop rotations, yet 66% of farmers also reported sowing consecutive barley often/always. Further research is needed in order to understand why these gaps exist, and how they can be reduced in future in order to increase IPM uptake and optimise pesticide use.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)96 - 102
    Number of pages7
    JournalCrop Protection
    Volume112
    Early online date26 May 2018
    DOIs
    Publication statusFirst published - 26 May 2018

    Fingerprint

    farmers' attitudes
    spring barley
    integrated pest management
    farmers
    agronomists
    Rhynchosporium
    pesticides
    Ramularia
    crop production
    disease resistance
    sowing
    barley
    pathogens

    Bibliographical note

    1031389

    Keywords

    • Crop rotation
    • Disease resistance
    • Farmer decision making
    • Integrated pest management

    Cite this

    @article{44bb0956d3b049828592a9045a272914,
    title = "Perception vs practice: Farmer attitudes towards and uptake of IPM in Scottish spring barley",
    abstract = "Integrated Pest Management (IPM) offers a suite of ways by which to reduce the need for pesticide use, thus minimising environmental damage and pathogen resistance build-up in crop production. Farmers and agronomists active in the Scottish spring barley sector were surveyed to determine the extent to which they currently use or are open to implementing three IPM measures – varietal disease resistance, crop rotation, and forecasting disease pressure – in order to control three important fungal diseases. Overall, the survey results demonstrate that farmers and agronomists are open to using the three IPM techniques. However, gaps between actual and perceived recent practice were large: despite over 60{\%} of farmers stating that they sowed varieties highly resistant to Rhynchosporium or Ramularia, less than one third of reportedly sown varieties were highly resistant to these diseases. Similarly, over 80{\%} of farmers indicated that they used crop rotations, yet 66{\%} of farmers also reported sowing consecutive barley often/always. Further research is needed in order to understand why these gaps exist, and how they can be reduced in future in order to increase IPM uptake and optimise pesticide use.",
    keywords = "Crop rotation, Disease resistance, Farmer decision making, Integrated pest management",
    author = "S Stetkiewicz and A Bruce and FJ Burnett and RA Ennos and CFE Topp",
    note = "1031389",
    year = "2018",
    month = "5",
    day = "26",
    doi = "10.1016/j.cropro.2018.05.005",
    language = "English",
    volume = "112",
    pages = "96 -- 102",
    journal = "Crop Protection",
    issn = "0261-2194",
    publisher = "Elsevier",

    }

    Perception vs practice: Farmer attitudes towards and uptake of IPM in Scottish spring barley. / Stetkiewicz, S; Bruce, A; Burnett, FJ; Ennos, RA; Topp, CFE.

    In: Crop Protection, Vol. 112, 26.05.2018, p. 96 - 102.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Perception vs practice: Farmer attitudes towards and uptake of IPM in Scottish spring barley

    AU - Stetkiewicz, S

    AU - Bruce, A

    AU - Burnett, FJ

    AU - Ennos, RA

    AU - Topp, CFE

    N1 - 1031389

    PY - 2018/5/26

    Y1 - 2018/5/26

    N2 - Integrated Pest Management (IPM) offers a suite of ways by which to reduce the need for pesticide use, thus minimising environmental damage and pathogen resistance build-up in crop production. Farmers and agronomists active in the Scottish spring barley sector were surveyed to determine the extent to which they currently use or are open to implementing three IPM measures – varietal disease resistance, crop rotation, and forecasting disease pressure – in order to control three important fungal diseases. Overall, the survey results demonstrate that farmers and agronomists are open to using the three IPM techniques. However, gaps between actual and perceived recent practice were large: despite over 60% of farmers stating that they sowed varieties highly resistant to Rhynchosporium or Ramularia, less than one third of reportedly sown varieties were highly resistant to these diseases. Similarly, over 80% of farmers indicated that they used crop rotations, yet 66% of farmers also reported sowing consecutive barley often/always. Further research is needed in order to understand why these gaps exist, and how they can be reduced in future in order to increase IPM uptake and optimise pesticide use.

    AB - Integrated Pest Management (IPM) offers a suite of ways by which to reduce the need for pesticide use, thus minimising environmental damage and pathogen resistance build-up in crop production. Farmers and agronomists active in the Scottish spring barley sector were surveyed to determine the extent to which they currently use or are open to implementing three IPM measures – varietal disease resistance, crop rotation, and forecasting disease pressure – in order to control three important fungal diseases. Overall, the survey results demonstrate that farmers and agronomists are open to using the three IPM techniques. However, gaps between actual and perceived recent practice were large: despite over 60% of farmers stating that they sowed varieties highly resistant to Rhynchosporium or Ramularia, less than one third of reportedly sown varieties were highly resistant to these diseases. Similarly, over 80% of farmers indicated that they used crop rotations, yet 66% of farmers also reported sowing consecutive barley often/always. Further research is needed in order to understand why these gaps exist, and how they can be reduced in future in order to increase IPM uptake and optimise pesticide use.

    KW - Crop rotation

    KW - Disease resistance

    KW - Farmer decision making

    KW - Integrated pest management

    UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/perception-vs-practice-farmer-attitudes-towards-uptake-ipm-scottish-spring-barley

    U2 - 10.1016/j.cropro.2018.05.005

    DO - 10.1016/j.cropro.2018.05.005

    M3 - Article

    VL - 112

    SP - 96

    EP - 102

    JO - Crop Protection

    JF - Crop Protection

    SN - 0261-2194

    ER -