Policy and practice certainty for effective uptake of diffuse pollution practices in a light-touch regulated country

JK Knook*, Robyn Dynes, Ina Pinxterhuis, Cecile A. M. de Klein, V Eory, Matthew Brander, Dominic Moran

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Although the link between agriculture and diffuse water pollution has been understood for decades, there is still a need to implement effective measures to address this issue. In countries with light-touch regulation, such as New Zealand and Australia, most efforts to promote environmental management practices have relied on voluntary initiatives such as participatory research and extension programmes; the success of which is largely dependent on farmers’ willingness and ability to adopt these practices. Increased understanding of the factors influencing farmer decision-making in this area would aid the promotion of effective advisory services. This study provides insights from 52 qualitative interviews with farmers and from observations of nine farmer meetings and field days. We qualitatively identify factors that influence farmer decision-making regarding the voluntary uptake of water quality practices and develop a typology for categorising farmers according to the factors that influence their decision-making. We find that in light-touch regulated countries certainty around policy and also around the effectiveness of practices is essential, particularly for farmers who delay action until compelled to act due to succession or regulation. The contribution of this paper is threefold: (i) it identifies factors influencing decision-making around the uptake of water quality practices in a light-touch regulated country; (ii) it develops a typology of different farmer types; and (iii) it provides recommendations on policy approaches for countries with light-touch regulation, which has potential relevance for any countries facing changes regarding their agricultural policy, such as post-Brexit policy in the UK.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)243-256
Number of pages14
JournalEnvironmental Management
Volume65
Issue number2
Early online date19 Dec 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPrint publication - 1 Feb 2020

Fingerprint

Pollution
Decision making
decision making
typology
Water quality
water quality
policy approach
Water pollution
Environmental management
agricultural policy
water pollution
Agriculture
environmental management
management practice
agriculture
diffuse pollution
policy
regulation

Keywords

  • Advisory services
  • Environmental management
  • Extension
  • Farmer behaviour
  • Water pollution

Cite this

Knook, JK ; Dynes, Robyn ; Pinxterhuis, Ina ; de Klein, Cecile A. M. ; Eory, V ; Brander, Matthew ; Moran, Dominic. / Policy and practice certainty for effective uptake of diffuse pollution practices in a light-touch regulated country. In: Environmental Management. 2020 ; Vol. 65, No. 2. pp. 243-256.
@article{c54f71b94e49474e940277fa5c9bcb59,
title = "Policy and practice certainty for effective uptake of diffuse pollution practices in a light-touch regulated country",
abstract = "Although the link between agriculture and diffuse water pollution has been understood for decades, there is still a need to implement effective measures to address this issue. In countries with light-touch regulation, such as New Zealand and Australia, most efforts to promote environmental management practices have relied on voluntary initiatives such as participatory research and extension programmes; the success of which is largely dependent on farmers’ willingness and ability to adopt these practices. Increased understanding of the factors influencing farmer decision-making in this area would aid the promotion of effective advisory services. This study provides insights from 52 qualitative interviews with farmers and from observations of nine farmer meetings and field days. We qualitatively identify factors that influence farmer decision-making regarding the voluntary uptake of water quality practices and develop a typology for categorising farmers according to the factors that influence their decision-making. We find that in light-touch regulated countries certainty around policy and also around the effectiveness of practices is essential, particularly for farmers who delay action until compelled to act due to succession or regulation. The contribution of this paper is threefold: (i) it identifies factors influencing decision-making around the uptake of water quality practices in a light-touch regulated country; (ii) it develops a typology of different farmer types; and (iii) it provides recommendations on policy approaches for countries with light-touch regulation, which has potential relevance for any countries facing changes regarding their agricultural policy, such as post-Brexit policy in the UK.",
keywords = "Advisory services, Environmental management, Extension, Farmer behaviour, Water pollution",
author = "JK Knook and Robyn Dynes and Ina Pinxterhuis and {de Klein}, {Cecile A. M.} and V Eory and Matthew Brander and Dominic Moran",
year = "2020",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s00267-019-01242-y",
language = "English",
volume = "65",
pages = "243--256",
journal = "Environmental Management",
issn = "0364-152X",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "2",

}

Policy and practice certainty for effective uptake of diffuse pollution practices in a light-touch regulated country. / Knook, JK; Dynes, Robyn; Pinxterhuis, Ina; de Klein, Cecile A. M.; Eory, V; Brander, Matthew; Moran, Dominic.

In: Environmental Management, Vol. 65, No. 2, 01.02.2020, p. 243-256.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Policy and practice certainty for effective uptake of diffuse pollution practices in a light-touch regulated country

AU - Knook, JK

AU - Dynes, Robyn

AU - Pinxterhuis, Ina

AU - de Klein, Cecile A. M.

AU - Eory, V

AU - Brander, Matthew

AU - Moran, Dominic

PY - 2020/2/1

Y1 - 2020/2/1

N2 - Although the link between agriculture and diffuse water pollution has been understood for decades, there is still a need to implement effective measures to address this issue. In countries with light-touch regulation, such as New Zealand and Australia, most efforts to promote environmental management practices have relied on voluntary initiatives such as participatory research and extension programmes; the success of which is largely dependent on farmers’ willingness and ability to adopt these practices. Increased understanding of the factors influencing farmer decision-making in this area would aid the promotion of effective advisory services. This study provides insights from 52 qualitative interviews with farmers and from observations of nine farmer meetings and field days. We qualitatively identify factors that influence farmer decision-making regarding the voluntary uptake of water quality practices and develop a typology for categorising farmers according to the factors that influence their decision-making. We find that in light-touch regulated countries certainty around policy and also around the effectiveness of practices is essential, particularly for farmers who delay action until compelled to act due to succession or regulation. The contribution of this paper is threefold: (i) it identifies factors influencing decision-making around the uptake of water quality practices in a light-touch regulated country; (ii) it develops a typology of different farmer types; and (iii) it provides recommendations on policy approaches for countries with light-touch regulation, which has potential relevance for any countries facing changes regarding their agricultural policy, such as post-Brexit policy in the UK.

AB - Although the link between agriculture and diffuse water pollution has been understood for decades, there is still a need to implement effective measures to address this issue. In countries with light-touch regulation, such as New Zealand and Australia, most efforts to promote environmental management practices have relied on voluntary initiatives such as participatory research and extension programmes; the success of which is largely dependent on farmers’ willingness and ability to adopt these practices. Increased understanding of the factors influencing farmer decision-making in this area would aid the promotion of effective advisory services. This study provides insights from 52 qualitative interviews with farmers and from observations of nine farmer meetings and field days. We qualitatively identify factors that influence farmer decision-making regarding the voluntary uptake of water quality practices and develop a typology for categorising farmers according to the factors that influence their decision-making. We find that in light-touch regulated countries certainty around policy and also around the effectiveness of practices is essential, particularly for farmers who delay action until compelled to act due to succession or regulation. The contribution of this paper is threefold: (i) it identifies factors influencing decision-making around the uptake of water quality practices in a light-touch regulated country; (ii) it develops a typology of different farmer types; and (iii) it provides recommendations on policy approaches for countries with light-touch regulation, which has potential relevance for any countries facing changes regarding their agricultural policy, such as post-Brexit policy in the UK.

KW - Advisory services

KW - Environmental management

KW - Extension

KW - Farmer behaviour

KW - Water pollution

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85077026092&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00267-019-01242-y

DO - 10.1007/s00267-019-01242-y

M3 - Article

VL - 65

SP - 243

EP - 256

JO - Environmental Management

JF - Environmental Management

SN - 0364-152X

IS - 2

ER -