Review: Exploring the use of Precision Livestock Farming for small ruminant welfare management

C Morgan-Davies*, Germain Tesniere, Jean-Marc Gautier, Grete H.M. Jorgensen, Eliel Gonzalez-Garcia, Sotiris Patsios, Evangelia Sossidou, Tim WJ Keady, Brid McClearn, Fiona Kenyon, Gerardo Caja, Lise Grova, Mauro Decandia, Ludovic Czizster, Ilan Halachmi, CM Dwyer

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

5 Citations (Scopus)
20 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Small ruminant (sheep and goat) production of meat and milk is undertaken in diverse topographical and climatic environments and the systems range from extensive to intensive. This could lead to different types of welfare compromise, which need to be managed. Implementing Precision Livestock Farming (PLF) and other new or innovative technologies could help to manage or monitor animal welfare. This paper explores such opportunities, seeking to identify promising aspects of PLF that may allow improved management of welfare for small ruminants using literature search (two reviews), workshops in nine countries (France, Greece, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Norway, Romania, Spain, and the United Kingdom) with 254 stakeholders, and panels with 52 experts. An investigation of the main welfare challenges that may affect sheep and goats across the different management systems in Europe was undertaken, followed by a prioritisation of animal welfare issues obtained in the nine countries. This suggested that disease and health issues, feed access and undernutrition/malnutrition, maternal behaviour/offspring losses, environmental stressors and issues with agonistic behavioural interactions were important welfare concerns. These welfare issues and their indicators (37 for sheep, 25 for goats) were categorised into four broad welfare indicator categories: weight loss or change in body state (BWC), behavioural change (BC), milk yield and quality (MY), and environmental indicators (Evt). In parallel, 24 potential PLF and innovative technologies (8 for BWC; 10 for BC; 4 for MY; 6 for Evt) that could be relevant to monitor these broad welfare indicator categories and provide novel approaches to manage and monitor welfare have been identified. Some technologies had the capacity to monitor more than one broad indicator. Out of the 24 technologies, only 12 were animal-based sensors, or that could monitor the animal individually. One alternative could be to incorporate a risk management approach to welfare, using aspects of environmental stress. This could provide an early warning system for the potential risks of animal welfare compromise and alert farmers to the need to implement mitigation actions.

Original languageEnglish
Article number101233
JournalAnimal
Early online date2 Jul 2024
DOIs
Publication statusFirst published - 2 Jul 2024

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 The Author(s)

Keywords

  • Goats
  • Sheep
  • Stakeholders
  • Technologies
  • Welfare indicators

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Review: Exploring the use of Precision Livestock Farming for small ruminant welfare management'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this