Revisiting cost vector effects in discrete choice experiments

K Glenk*, Jürgen Meyerhoff, Faical Akaichi, Julia Martin-Ortega

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The estimation of marginal utility of income in discrete choice experiments is of crucial importance for the estimation of willingness to pay (WTP) and welfare estimates. Despite this central importance, there are only few investigations into the impact of the design of the cost attribute vector on choices and WTP estimates. We present a conceptual framework that describes why cost vector effects might occur in choice experiments, and investigate cost vector effects empirically drawing on data from a choice experiment in the context of peatland restoration in Scotland. This study employs a split sample approach with three different cost vectors that vary considerably in the cost levels offered to respondents, and investigates differences between treatments with respect to marginal WTP estimates, status quo choice, use of systematic decision strategies and attribute non-attendance. A key finding is that the choice of cost vectors can affect the incidence of decision strategies. After accounting for the differential use of a decision strategy that might not be consistent with random utility modelling, cost vectors that are higher in magnitude result in higher WTP, in line with an anchoring hypothesis. We find weak support that marginal WTP of lower income respondents is affected differently compared to higher income respondents through the use of different cost vectors. Differences in welfare estimates resulting from the use of different cost vectors might change outcomes of cost-benefit analyses. We therefore recommend that researchers include tests of sensitivity of welfare estimates to different cost vectors in their study design.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)135-155
Number of pages21
JournalResource and Energy Economics
Volume57
Early online date11 May 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPrint publication - Aug 2019

Fingerprint

Costs
Discrete choice experiment
Willingness-to-pay
Decision strategy
Choice experiment
Income
Conceptual framework
Scotland
Low income
Random utility
Restoration
Anchoring
Cost-benefit
Status quo
Cost modeling
Marginal utility

Bibliographical note

This research was partly funded by the Scottish Government Rural Affairs and the Environment Portfolio Strategic Research Programme 2011-2016 and 2016–2021 and the Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) through the project ‘Understanding ecosystem stocks and tipping points in UK peatlands’ (NE/P00783X/1).

Keywords

  • Environmental valuation
  • Stated preferences
  • Context dependence
  • Anchoring
  • Decision strategies

Cite this

Glenk, K ; Meyerhoff, Jürgen ; Akaichi, Faical ; Martin-Ortega, Julia. / Revisiting cost vector effects in discrete choice experiments. In: Resource and Energy Economics. 2019 ; Vol. 57. pp. 135-155.
@article{2e052e3181e344bb955d797b468cbf85,
title = "Revisiting cost vector effects in discrete choice experiments",
abstract = "The estimation of marginal utility of income in discrete choice experiments is of crucial importance for the estimation of willingness to pay (WTP) and welfare estimates. Despite this central importance, there are only few investigations into the impact of the design of the cost attribute vector on choices and WTP estimates. We present a conceptual framework that describes why cost vector effects might occur in choice experiments, and investigate cost vector effects empirically drawing on data from a choice experiment in the context of peatland restoration in Scotland. This study employs a split sample approach with three different cost vectors that vary considerably in the cost levels offered to respondents, and investigates differences between treatments with respect to marginal WTP estimates, status quo choice, use of systematic decision strategies and attribute non-attendance. A key finding is that the choice of cost vectors can affect the incidence of decision strategies. After accounting for the differential use of a decision strategy that might not be consistent with random utility modelling, cost vectors that are higher in magnitude result in higher WTP, in line with an anchoring hypothesis. We find weak support that marginal WTP of lower income respondents is affected differently compared to higher income respondents through the use of different cost vectors. Differences in welfare estimates resulting from the use of different cost vectors might change outcomes of cost-benefit analyses. We therefore recommend that researchers include tests of sensitivity of welfare estimates to different cost vectors in their study design.",
keywords = "Environmental valuation, Stated preferences, Context dependence, Anchoring, Decision strategies",
author = "K Glenk and J{\"u}rgen Meyerhoff and Faical Akaichi and Julia Martin-Ortega",
note = "This research was partly funded by the Scottish Government Rural Affairs and the Environment Portfolio Strategic Research Programme 2011-2016 and 2016–2021 and the Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) through the project ‘Understanding ecosystem stocks and tipping points in UK peatlands’ (NE/P00783X/1).",
year = "2019",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1016/j.reseneeco.2019.05.001",
language = "English",
volume = "57",
pages = "135--155",
journal = "Resources and Energy Economics",
issn = "0928-7655",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

Revisiting cost vector effects in discrete choice experiments. / Glenk, K; Meyerhoff, Jürgen; Akaichi, Faical; Martin-Ortega, Julia.

In: Resource and Energy Economics, Vol. 57, 08.2019, p. 135-155.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Revisiting cost vector effects in discrete choice experiments

AU - Glenk, K

AU - Meyerhoff, Jürgen

AU - Akaichi, Faical

AU - Martin-Ortega, Julia

N1 - This research was partly funded by the Scottish Government Rural Affairs and the Environment Portfolio Strategic Research Programme 2011-2016 and 2016–2021 and the Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) through the project ‘Understanding ecosystem stocks and tipping points in UK peatlands’ (NE/P00783X/1).

PY - 2019/8

Y1 - 2019/8

N2 - The estimation of marginal utility of income in discrete choice experiments is of crucial importance for the estimation of willingness to pay (WTP) and welfare estimates. Despite this central importance, there are only few investigations into the impact of the design of the cost attribute vector on choices and WTP estimates. We present a conceptual framework that describes why cost vector effects might occur in choice experiments, and investigate cost vector effects empirically drawing on data from a choice experiment in the context of peatland restoration in Scotland. This study employs a split sample approach with three different cost vectors that vary considerably in the cost levels offered to respondents, and investigates differences between treatments with respect to marginal WTP estimates, status quo choice, use of systematic decision strategies and attribute non-attendance. A key finding is that the choice of cost vectors can affect the incidence of decision strategies. After accounting for the differential use of a decision strategy that might not be consistent with random utility modelling, cost vectors that are higher in magnitude result in higher WTP, in line with an anchoring hypothesis. We find weak support that marginal WTP of lower income respondents is affected differently compared to higher income respondents through the use of different cost vectors. Differences in welfare estimates resulting from the use of different cost vectors might change outcomes of cost-benefit analyses. We therefore recommend that researchers include tests of sensitivity of welfare estimates to different cost vectors in their study design.

AB - The estimation of marginal utility of income in discrete choice experiments is of crucial importance for the estimation of willingness to pay (WTP) and welfare estimates. Despite this central importance, there are only few investigations into the impact of the design of the cost attribute vector on choices and WTP estimates. We present a conceptual framework that describes why cost vector effects might occur in choice experiments, and investigate cost vector effects empirically drawing on data from a choice experiment in the context of peatland restoration in Scotland. This study employs a split sample approach with three different cost vectors that vary considerably in the cost levels offered to respondents, and investigates differences between treatments with respect to marginal WTP estimates, status quo choice, use of systematic decision strategies and attribute non-attendance. A key finding is that the choice of cost vectors can affect the incidence of decision strategies. After accounting for the differential use of a decision strategy that might not be consistent with random utility modelling, cost vectors that are higher in magnitude result in higher WTP, in line with an anchoring hypothesis. We find weak support that marginal WTP of lower income respondents is affected differently compared to higher income respondents through the use of different cost vectors. Differences in welfare estimates resulting from the use of different cost vectors might change outcomes of cost-benefit analyses. We therefore recommend that researchers include tests of sensitivity of welfare estimates to different cost vectors in their study design.

KW - Environmental valuation

KW - Stated preferences

KW - Context dependence

KW - Anchoring

KW - Decision strategies

U2 - 10.1016/j.reseneeco.2019.05.001

DO - 10.1016/j.reseneeco.2019.05.001

M3 - Article

VL - 57

SP - 135

EP - 155

JO - Resources and Energy Economics

JF - Resources and Energy Economics

SN - 0928-7655

ER -