TY - JOUR
T1 - Risk factors for bovine Tuberculosis at the national level in Great Britain
AU - Bessell, PR
AU - Orton, R
AU - White, PCL
AU - Hutchings, MR
AU - Kao, RR
N1 - 1023364
PY - 2012
Y1 - 2012
N2 - Background: The continuing expansion of high incidence areas of bovine Tuberculosis (bTB) in Great Britain (GB)
raises a number of questions concerning the determinants of infection at the herd level that are driving spread of
the disease. Here, we develop risk factor models to quantify the importance of herd sizes, cattle imports from
Ireland, history of bTB, badgers and cattle restocking in determining bTB incidence. We compare the significance of
these different risk factors in high and low incidence areas (as determined by parish testing intervals).
Results: Large herds and fattening herds are more likely to breakdown in all areas. In areas with lower perceived
risk (longer testing intervals), the risk of breaking down is largely determined by the number of animals that a herd
buys in from high incidence areas. In contrast, in higher perceived risk areas (shorter testing intervals), the risk of
breakdown is defined by the history of disease and the probability of badger occurrence. Despite differences in the
management of bTB across different countries of GB (England, Wales and Scotland), we found no significant
differences in bTB risk at the national level after these other factors had been taken into account.
Conclusions: This paper demonstrates that different types of farm are at risk of breakdown and that the most
important risk factors vary according to bTB incidence in an area. The results suggest that significant gains in bTB
control could be made by targeting herds in low incidence areas that import the greatest number of cattle from
high incidence areas.
AB - Background: The continuing expansion of high incidence areas of bovine Tuberculosis (bTB) in Great Britain (GB)
raises a number of questions concerning the determinants of infection at the herd level that are driving spread of
the disease. Here, we develop risk factor models to quantify the importance of herd sizes, cattle imports from
Ireland, history of bTB, badgers and cattle restocking in determining bTB incidence. We compare the significance of
these different risk factors in high and low incidence areas (as determined by parish testing intervals).
Results: Large herds and fattening herds are more likely to breakdown in all areas. In areas with lower perceived
risk (longer testing intervals), the risk of breaking down is largely determined by the number of animals that a herd
buys in from high incidence areas. In contrast, in higher perceived risk areas (shorter testing intervals), the risk of
breakdown is defined by the history of disease and the probability of badger occurrence. Despite differences in the
management of bTB across different countries of GB (England, Wales and Scotland), we found no significant
differences in bTB risk at the national level after these other factors had been taken into account.
Conclusions: This paper demonstrates that different types of farm are at risk of breakdown and that the most
important risk factors vary according to bTB incidence in an area. The results suggest that significant gains in bTB
control could be made by targeting herds in low incidence areas that import the greatest number of cattle from
high incidence areas.
M3 - Article
SN - 1746-6148
VL - 8
JO - BMC Veterinary Research
JF - BMC Veterinary Research
ER -