Simplistic understandings of farmer motivations could undermine the environmental potential of the common agricultural policy

Calum Brown, Eszter Kovacs, Iryna Herzon, Sergio Villamayor_Tomas, Amaia Albizua, Antonia Galanki, Ioanna Grammatikopoulou, DI McCracken, Johanna Olsson, Yves Zinngrebe

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The European Union Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) has failed to achieve its aim of preserving European farmland biodiversity, despite massive investment in subsidies to incentivise environmentally-beneficial farming practices. This failure calls into question the design of the subsidy schemes, which are intended to either function as a safety net and make farming profitable or compensate farmers for costs and loss of income while undertaking environmental management. In this study, we assess whether the design of environmental payments in the CAP reflects current knowledge about farmers’ decision-making as found in the research literature. We do so on the basis of a comprehensive literature review on farmers’ uptake of agri-environmental management practices over the past 10 years and interviews specifically focused on Ecological Focus Areas with policy-makers, advisors and farmers in seven European countries. We find that economic and structural factors are the most commonly-identified determinants of farmers’ adoption of environmental management practices in the literature and in interviews. However, the literature suggests that these are complemented by – and partially dependent on – a broad range of social, attitudinal and other contextual factors that are not recognised in interview responses or, potentially, in policy design. The relatively simplistic conceptualisation of farmer behaviour that underlies some aspects of policy design may hamper the effectiveness of environmental payments in the CAP by over-emphasising economic considerations, potentially corroding farmer attitudes to policy and environmental objectives. We conclude that an urgent redesign of agricultural subsidies is needed to better align them with the economic, social and environmental factors affecting farmer decision-making in a complex production climate, and therefore to maximise potential environmental benefits.

Original languageEnglish
Article number105136
JournalLand Use Policy
Early online date1 Nov 2020
DOIs
Publication statusFirst published - 1 Nov 2020

Keywords

  • Agri-environment
  • Common agricultural policy
  • Ecological focus areas
  • Environmental payments
  • Farmer decision-making
  • Greening

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Simplistic understandings of farmer motivations could undermine the environmental potential of the common agricultural policy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this