Sow welfare in the farrowing crate and alternatives

Emma M. Baxter*, Inger Lise Andersen, Sandra A. Edwards

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The farrowing crate poses a welfare dilemma; the restriction of sow movement interferes with the performance of species-specific behaviours such as nest-building, orientation, exploration and communication with the piglets and leads to increased physiological stress. However, allowing the sow more freedom to perform motivated behaviours often results in increased crushing of piglets and hence a piglet welfare problem. Although alternative farrowing systems exist, a major barrier to the uptake of these systems is that they must deliver acceptable levels of piglet mortality. Research efforts have led to successful development of loose farrowing systems delivering high performance and high welfare. The key to success has been recognising that allowing the display of species-typical behaviours contributes to the biological fitness of the animal, which encompasses important economic performance parameters including number of offspring produced, viability of offspring and maternal rearing ability. Further welfare challenges have developed as sows have been subject to genetic selection pressure for leanness and prolificacy. A more balanced equation where the cost of maternal investment (for instance shoulder lesions, loss of body condition, lower residual reproductive output and thus shorter longevity) is balanced against the increase in the number of piglets born and weaned, is needed as a basis for breeding programs. Therefore system design optimisation must be accompanied by optimisation of both human inputs (i.e., through augmentation of management) and animal inputs (i.e., through appropriate genetic selection strategies).

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationAdvances in Pig Welfare
EditorsMarek Spinka
PublisherElsevier Inc.
Chapter2
Pages27-72
Number of pages45
ISBN (Electronic)9780081011195
ISBN (Print)9780081010129
DOIs
Publication statusPrint publication - 2018

Fingerprint

farrowing crates
sows
piglets
Genetic Selection
Mothers
farrowing
Physiological Stress
Aptitude
Thinness
Breeding
Communication
Economics
economic performance
crushing
Pressure
Costs and Cost Analysis
shoulders
Mortality
lesions (animal)
animal communication

Bibliographical note

© 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Keywords

  • Free farrowing
  • Genetic selection
  • Management
  • Maternal behaviour
  • Piglet survival
  • Prolificacy

Cite this

Baxter, E. M., Andersen, I. L., & Edwards, S. A. (2018). Sow welfare in the farrowing crate and alternatives. In M. Spinka (Ed.), Advances in Pig Welfare (pp. 27-72). Elsevier Inc.. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-101012-9.00002-2
Baxter, Emma M. ; Andersen, Inger Lise ; Edwards, Sandra A. / Sow welfare in the farrowing crate and alternatives. Advances in Pig Welfare. editor / Marek Spinka. Elsevier Inc., 2018. pp. 27-72
@inbook{0e1e2eeaef86437dba2c5275372f4959,
title = "Sow welfare in the farrowing crate and alternatives",
abstract = "The farrowing crate poses a welfare dilemma; the restriction of sow movement interferes with the performance of species-specific behaviours such as nest-building, orientation, exploration and communication with the piglets and leads to increased physiological stress. However, allowing the sow more freedom to perform motivated behaviours often results in increased crushing of piglets and hence a piglet welfare problem. Although alternative farrowing systems exist, a major barrier to the uptake of these systems is that they must deliver acceptable levels of piglet mortality. Research efforts have led to successful development of loose farrowing systems delivering high performance and high welfare. The key to success has been recognising that allowing the display of species-typical behaviours contributes to the biological fitness of the animal, which encompasses important economic performance parameters including number of offspring produced, viability of offspring and maternal rearing ability. Further welfare challenges have developed as sows have been subject to genetic selection pressure for leanness and prolificacy. A more balanced equation where the cost of maternal investment (for instance shoulder lesions, loss of body condition, lower residual reproductive output and thus shorter longevity) is balanced against the increase in the number of piglets born and weaned, is needed as a basis for breeding programs. Therefore system design optimisation must be accompanied by optimisation of both human inputs (i.e., through augmentation of management) and animal inputs (i.e., through appropriate genetic selection strategies).",
keywords = "Free farrowing, Genetic selection, Management, Maternal behaviour, Piglet survival, Prolificacy",
author = "Baxter, {Emma M.} and Andersen, {Inger Lise} and Edwards, {Sandra A.}",
note = "{\circledC} 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.",
year = "2018",
doi = "10.1016/B978-0-08-101012-9.00002-2",
language = "English",
isbn = "9780081010129",
pages = "27--72",
editor = "Marek Spinka",
booktitle = "Advances in Pig Welfare",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",

}

Baxter, EM, Andersen, IL & Edwards, SA 2018, Sow welfare in the farrowing crate and alternatives. in M Spinka (ed.), Advances in Pig Welfare. Elsevier Inc., pp. 27-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-101012-9.00002-2

Sow welfare in the farrowing crate and alternatives. / Baxter, Emma M.; Andersen, Inger Lise; Edwards, Sandra A.

Advances in Pig Welfare. ed. / Marek Spinka. Elsevier Inc., 2018. p. 27-72.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

TY - CHAP

T1 - Sow welfare in the farrowing crate and alternatives

AU - Baxter, Emma M.

AU - Andersen, Inger Lise

AU - Edwards, Sandra A.

N1 - © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - The farrowing crate poses a welfare dilemma; the restriction of sow movement interferes with the performance of species-specific behaviours such as nest-building, orientation, exploration and communication with the piglets and leads to increased physiological stress. However, allowing the sow more freedom to perform motivated behaviours often results in increased crushing of piglets and hence a piglet welfare problem. Although alternative farrowing systems exist, a major barrier to the uptake of these systems is that they must deliver acceptable levels of piglet mortality. Research efforts have led to successful development of loose farrowing systems delivering high performance and high welfare. The key to success has been recognising that allowing the display of species-typical behaviours contributes to the biological fitness of the animal, which encompasses important economic performance parameters including number of offspring produced, viability of offspring and maternal rearing ability. Further welfare challenges have developed as sows have been subject to genetic selection pressure for leanness and prolificacy. A more balanced equation where the cost of maternal investment (for instance shoulder lesions, loss of body condition, lower residual reproductive output and thus shorter longevity) is balanced against the increase in the number of piglets born and weaned, is needed as a basis for breeding programs. Therefore system design optimisation must be accompanied by optimisation of both human inputs (i.e., through augmentation of management) and animal inputs (i.e., through appropriate genetic selection strategies).

AB - The farrowing crate poses a welfare dilemma; the restriction of sow movement interferes with the performance of species-specific behaviours such as nest-building, orientation, exploration and communication with the piglets and leads to increased physiological stress. However, allowing the sow more freedom to perform motivated behaviours often results in increased crushing of piglets and hence a piglet welfare problem. Although alternative farrowing systems exist, a major barrier to the uptake of these systems is that they must deliver acceptable levels of piglet mortality. Research efforts have led to successful development of loose farrowing systems delivering high performance and high welfare. The key to success has been recognising that allowing the display of species-typical behaviours contributes to the biological fitness of the animal, which encompasses important economic performance parameters including number of offspring produced, viability of offspring and maternal rearing ability. Further welfare challenges have developed as sows have been subject to genetic selection pressure for leanness and prolificacy. A more balanced equation where the cost of maternal investment (for instance shoulder lesions, loss of body condition, lower residual reproductive output and thus shorter longevity) is balanced against the increase in the number of piglets born and weaned, is needed as a basis for breeding programs. Therefore system design optimisation must be accompanied by optimisation of both human inputs (i.e., through augmentation of management) and animal inputs (i.e., through appropriate genetic selection strategies).

KW - Free farrowing

KW - Genetic selection

KW - Management

KW - Maternal behaviour

KW - Piglet survival

KW - Prolificacy

U2 - 10.1016/B978-0-08-101012-9.00002-2

DO - 10.1016/B978-0-08-101012-9.00002-2

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:85042528908

SN - 9780081010129

SP - 27

EP - 72

BT - Advances in Pig Welfare

A2 - Spinka, Marek

PB - Elsevier Inc.

ER -

Baxter EM, Andersen IL, Edwards SA. Sow welfare in the farrowing crate and alternatives. In Spinka M, editor, Advances in Pig Welfare. Elsevier Inc. 2018. p. 27-72 https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-101012-9.00002-2