Stakeholder opinions on the practicality of management interventions to control bovine tuberculosis

CE Cowie, C Gortazar, PCL White, MR Hutchings, J Vicente

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Livestock disease control strategies are usually determined at national and international levels, yet their successful implementation is determined by stakeholders operating at local scales. Such stakeholders may also have detailed knowledge that would contribute to the development of disease control options suited to the socio-cultural and environmental conditions where management is undertaken. The aim of this study was to evaluate stakeholders’ opinions of a list of potential bovine tuberculosis (TB) management interventions for South Central Spain. This area has high TB prevalence in wildlife and livestock, so veterinarians, livestock farmers and hunters are all key stakeholders in TB management. A literature review identified possible management activities. The effectiveness of each intervention was ranked by local experts, and practicality was ranked by hunters, cattle farmers and veterinarians, using a best– worst scaling exercise as part of a questionnaire. The most effective intervention, the banning of supplemental feeding of game species, was not considered practical by stakeholders. The most effective and practical interventions were the separation of wildlife and livestock access to waterholes, testing cattle every 3 months on farms with a recent positive TB case and removing gut-piles from the land after hunting events. Although all three of these options were well supported, each stakeholder group supported different approaches more strongly, suggesting that it might be effective to promote different disease management contributions in different stakeholder communities. This integrated approach contributes to the identification of the optimum combination of management tools that can be delivered effectively. © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)179 - 185
Number of pages7
JournalVeterinary Journal
Volume204
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusFirst published - 2015

Fingerprint

bovine tuberculosis
stakeholders
disease control
livestock
tuberculosis
veterinarians
farmers
game animals
livestock diseases
cattle
dietary supplements
wildlife
exercise
questionnaires
digestive system
Spain
farms
environmental factors
testing
hunters

Bibliographical note

1020807
1023364

Keywords

  • Best-worst scaling
  • Disease management
  • South Central Spain
  • Stakeholder consultation

Cite this

Cowie, CE ; Gortazar, C ; White, PCL ; Hutchings, MR ; Vicente, J. / Stakeholder opinions on the practicality of management interventions to control bovine tuberculosis. In: Veterinary Journal. 2015 ; Vol. 204, No. 2. pp. 179 - 185.
@article{e0dffce6c7184f73ab18d4cfd46df838,
title = "Stakeholder opinions on the practicality of management interventions to control bovine tuberculosis",
abstract = "Livestock disease control strategies are usually determined at national and international levels, yet their successful implementation is determined by stakeholders operating at local scales. Such stakeholders may also have detailed knowledge that would contribute to the development of disease control options suited to the socio-cultural and environmental conditions where management is undertaken. The aim of this study was to evaluate stakeholders’ opinions of a list of potential bovine tuberculosis (TB) management interventions for South Central Spain. This area has high TB prevalence in wildlife and livestock, so veterinarians, livestock farmers and hunters are all key stakeholders in TB management. A literature review identified possible management activities. The effectiveness of each intervention was ranked by local experts, and practicality was ranked by hunters, cattle farmers and veterinarians, using a best– worst scaling exercise as part of a questionnaire. The most effective intervention, the banning of supplemental feeding of game species, was not considered practical by stakeholders. The most effective and practical interventions were the separation of wildlife and livestock access to waterholes, testing cattle every 3 months on farms with a recent positive TB case and removing gut-piles from the land after hunting events. Although all three of these options were well supported, each stakeholder group supported different approaches more strongly, suggesting that it might be effective to promote different disease management contributions in different stakeholder communities. This integrated approach contributes to the identification of the optimum combination of management tools that can be delivered effectively. {\circledC} 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.",
keywords = "Best-worst scaling, Disease management, South Central Spain, Stakeholder consultation",
author = "CE Cowie and C Gortazar and PCL White and MR Hutchings and J Vicente",
note = "1020807 1023364",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1016/j.tvjl.2015.02.022",
language = "English",
volume = "204",
pages = "179 -- 185",
journal = "Veterinary Journal",
issn = "1090-0233",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "2",

}

Stakeholder opinions on the practicality of management interventions to control bovine tuberculosis. / Cowie, CE; Gortazar, C; White, PCL; Hutchings, MR; Vicente, J.

In: Veterinary Journal, Vol. 204, No. 2, 2015, p. 179 - 185.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Stakeholder opinions on the practicality of management interventions to control bovine tuberculosis

AU - Cowie, CE

AU - Gortazar, C

AU - White, PCL

AU - Hutchings, MR

AU - Vicente, J

N1 - 1020807 1023364

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - Livestock disease control strategies are usually determined at national and international levels, yet their successful implementation is determined by stakeholders operating at local scales. Such stakeholders may also have detailed knowledge that would contribute to the development of disease control options suited to the socio-cultural and environmental conditions where management is undertaken. The aim of this study was to evaluate stakeholders’ opinions of a list of potential bovine tuberculosis (TB) management interventions for South Central Spain. This area has high TB prevalence in wildlife and livestock, so veterinarians, livestock farmers and hunters are all key stakeholders in TB management. A literature review identified possible management activities. The effectiveness of each intervention was ranked by local experts, and practicality was ranked by hunters, cattle farmers and veterinarians, using a best– worst scaling exercise as part of a questionnaire. The most effective intervention, the banning of supplemental feeding of game species, was not considered practical by stakeholders. The most effective and practical interventions were the separation of wildlife and livestock access to waterholes, testing cattle every 3 months on farms with a recent positive TB case and removing gut-piles from the land after hunting events. Although all three of these options were well supported, each stakeholder group supported different approaches more strongly, suggesting that it might be effective to promote different disease management contributions in different stakeholder communities. This integrated approach contributes to the identification of the optimum combination of management tools that can be delivered effectively. © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

AB - Livestock disease control strategies are usually determined at national and international levels, yet their successful implementation is determined by stakeholders operating at local scales. Such stakeholders may also have detailed knowledge that would contribute to the development of disease control options suited to the socio-cultural and environmental conditions where management is undertaken. The aim of this study was to evaluate stakeholders’ opinions of a list of potential bovine tuberculosis (TB) management interventions for South Central Spain. This area has high TB prevalence in wildlife and livestock, so veterinarians, livestock farmers and hunters are all key stakeholders in TB management. A literature review identified possible management activities. The effectiveness of each intervention was ranked by local experts, and practicality was ranked by hunters, cattle farmers and veterinarians, using a best– worst scaling exercise as part of a questionnaire. The most effective intervention, the banning of supplemental feeding of game species, was not considered practical by stakeholders. The most effective and practical interventions were the separation of wildlife and livestock access to waterholes, testing cattle every 3 months on farms with a recent positive TB case and removing gut-piles from the land after hunting events. Although all three of these options were well supported, each stakeholder group supported different approaches more strongly, suggesting that it might be effective to promote different disease management contributions in different stakeholder communities. This integrated approach contributes to the identification of the optimum combination of management tools that can be delivered effectively. © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

KW - Best-worst scaling

KW - Disease management

KW - South Central Spain

KW - Stakeholder consultation

U2 - 10.1016/j.tvjl.2015.02.022

DO - 10.1016/j.tvjl.2015.02.022

M3 - Article

VL - 204

SP - 179

EP - 185

JO - Veterinary Journal

JF - Veterinary Journal

SN - 1090-0233

IS - 2

ER -