Abstract
Restoration offers opportunities for securing and enhancing critical ecosystem services provided by peatlands, such as carbon storage, water retention and water quality, and support for biodiversity and wildlife. A comprehensive valuation encompassing the relevant public benefits of restoration and how these compare with it is lacking to date, leaving policy makers with little guidance with respect to the economic efficiency of restoring this climate-critical ecosystem. Using Scotland as a case study, this paper quantifies the non-market benefits of changes in peatland ecological condition associated with changes in ecosystem service provision and depending on the location of restoration efforts. Benefits on a per hectare basis are compared to varying capital and recurrent cost in a net present value space, providing a benchmark to be used in decision making on investments into peatland restoration. The findings suggest that peatland restoration is likely to be welfare enhancing. Benefits also exceed cost in appraisals of previous and future public investments into peatland restoration. The results thus strengthen the economic rationale for climate change mitigation through improved peatland management.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 345 - 362 |
| Number of pages | 18 |
| Journal | Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy |
| Volume | 7 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| Early online date | 19 Feb 2018 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | First published - 19 Feb 2018 |
Bibliographical note
10313791031036
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 13 Climate Action
Keywords
- Benefit-cost assessment
- Choice experiment
- Climate change mitigation
- Ecosystem restoration
- Net present value
- Peatlands
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The economics of peatland restoration'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Research output
- 58 Citations
- 1 Article
-
Environmental attitudes and place identity as determinants of preferences for ecosystem services
Faccioli, M., Czajkowski, M., Glenk, K. & Martin-Ortega, J., Aug 2020, In: Ecological Economics. 174, 106600.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
Open AccessFile126 Link opens in a new tab Citations (Scopus)134 Downloads (Pure)
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver