The need for co-product allocation in the life cycle assessment of agricultural systems—is “biophysical” allocation progress?

Stephen G. Mackenzie, Ilkka Leinonen, Ilias Kyriazakis

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

20 Citations (Scopus)
1 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Several new “biophysical” co-product allocation methodologies have been developed for LCA studies of agricultural systems based on proposed physical or causal relationships between inputs and outputs (i.e. co-products). These methodologies are thus meant to be preferable to established allocation methodologies such as economic allocation under the ISO 14044 standard. The aim here was to examine whether these methodologies really represent underlying physical relationships between the material and energy flows and the co-products in such systems, and hence are of value.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)128-137
Number of pages10
JournalInternational Journal of Life Cycle Assessment
Volume22
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPrint publication - Feb 2017
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

life cycle
methodology
energy flow
farming system
allocation
need
product
economics

Keywords

  • Agricultural LCA
  • Agricultural systems
  • Allocation methodology
  • Biophysical allocation
  • Co-product allocation
  • Livestock LCA

Cite this

@article{d61c8392ddea400ca7cb21abddf5cc36,
title = "The need for co-product allocation in the life cycle assessment of agricultural systems—is “biophysical” allocation progress?",
abstract = "Several new “biophysical” co-product allocation methodologies have been developed for LCA studies of agricultural systems based on proposed physical or causal relationships between inputs and outputs (i.e. co-products). These methodologies are thus meant to be preferable to established allocation methodologies such as economic allocation under the ISO 14044 standard. The aim here was to examine whether these methodologies really represent underlying physical relationships between the material and energy flows and the co-products in such systems, and hence are of value.",
keywords = "Agricultural LCA, Agricultural systems, Allocation methodology, Biophysical allocation, Co-product allocation, Livestock LCA",
author = "Mackenzie, {Stephen G.} and Ilkka Leinonen and Ilias Kyriazakis",
year = "2017",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1007/s11367-016-1161-2",
language = "English",
volume = "22",
pages = "128--137",
journal = "International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment",
issn = "0948-3349",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
number = "2",

}

The need for co-product allocation in the life cycle assessment of agricultural systems—is “biophysical” allocation progress? / Mackenzie, Stephen G.; Leinonen, Ilkka; Kyriazakis, Ilias.

In: International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, Vol. 22, No. 2, 02.2017, p. 128-137.

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

TY - JOUR

T1 - The need for co-product allocation in the life cycle assessment of agricultural systems—is “biophysical” allocation progress?

AU - Mackenzie, Stephen G.

AU - Leinonen, Ilkka

AU - Kyriazakis, Ilias

PY - 2017/2

Y1 - 2017/2

N2 - Several new “biophysical” co-product allocation methodologies have been developed for LCA studies of agricultural systems based on proposed physical or causal relationships between inputs and outputs (i.e. co-products). These methodologies are thus meant to be preferable to established allocation methodologies such as economic allocation under the ISO 14044 standard. The aim here was to examine whether these methodologies really represent underlying physical relationships between the material and energy flows and the co-products in such systems, and hence are of value.

AB - Several new “biophysical” co-product allocation methodologies have been developed for LCA studies of agricultural systems based on proposed physical or causal relationships between inputs and outputs (i.e. co-products). These methodologies are thus meant to be preferable to established allocation methodologies such as economic allocation under the ISO 14044 standard. The aim here was to examine whether these methodologies really represent underlying physical relationships between the material and energy flows and the co-products in such systems, and hence are of value.

KW - Agricultural LCA

KW - Agricultural systems

KW - Allocation methodology

KW - Biophysical allocation

KW - Co-product allocation

KW - Livestock LCA

U2 - 10.1007/s11367-016-1161-2

DO - 10.1007/s11367-016-1161-2

M3 - Comment/debate

VL - 22

SP - 128

EP - 137

JO - International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment

JF - International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment

SN - 0948-3349

IS - 2

ER -