Abstract
Several new “biophysical” co-product allocation methodologies have been developed for LCA studies of agricultural systems based on proposed physical or causal relationships between inputs and outputs (i.e. co-products). These methodologies are thus meant to be preferable to established allocation methodologies such as economic allocation under the ISO 14044 standard. The aim here was to examine whether these methodologies really represent underlying physical relationships between the material and energy flows and the co-products in such systems, and hence are of value.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 128-137 |
| Number of pages | 10 |
| Journal | International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment |
| Volume | 22 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs |
|
| Publication status | Print publication - Feb 2017 |
| Externally published | Yes |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 7 Affordable and Clean Energy
-
SDG 12 Responsible Consumption and Production
Keywords
- Agricultural LCA
- Agricultural systems
- Allocation methodology
- Biophysical allocation
- Co-product allocation
- Livestock LCA
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The need for co-product allocation in the life cycle assessment of agricultural systems—is “biophysical” allocation progress?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver