Projects per year
Abstract
Application
Microbiome-driven breeding, as a cost-effective strategy to mitigate methane (CH4)
emissions, is recommended to be used in a multiple trait model with correlated production
traits, as it substantially increased the accuracy of estimation of breeding values (EBVs) and
thus enhances selection response.
Introduction
Roehe et al. (2016) found that rumen microbial gene abundances are closely linked to CH4
emissions and highlighted these as a highly informative proxy for breeding low CH4 emitting
cattle. Later, Martinez-Alvaro et al. (2022) demonstrated the effectiveness of using
microbial genes in microbiome-driven breeding to reduce CH4 yield (expressed as g of
CH4/kg of dry matter intake). In this study, we applied microbiome-driven breeding for
mitigating daily CH4 emissions (g of CH4 /day), and incorporated information from key
performance traits genetically associated with CH4 emissions, such as daily feed intake (DFI),
average daily gain (ADG) and carcass weight (CCW).
Materials and Methods
The experiment was conducted following the UK Animals Act 1986 and was approved by the
Animal Experiment Committee of SRUC. Three hundred sixty-three steers raised under the
same housing conditions on the same research farm were used in this project. The animals
were balanced for different breeds (Aberdeen Angus, Limousin, Charolais crosses and
purebred Luing) and basal diets (two diets of 520:480 and 920:80 forage:concentrate ratios).
Blood and rumen fluid samples were collected at slaughter. Microbial DNA sequence reads
from rumen fluid samples were aligned to the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes
database, resulting in the identification of 3362 microbial genes. To account for the
compositionality of microbiome data, microbial gene abundance data were transformed
using the additive log-ratio method. CH4 production was measured individually for 285 of
the 363 animals over a 48-hour period using six respiration chambers and expressed as CH4
emissions per day (CH4p).
Firstly, we conducted multiple bivariate genomic (37K SNPs) analyses to obtain genetic
variances and covariances between CH4p and microbial genes. Secondly, we identified the
most informative microbial genes that yielded the largest correlated response in CH4p.
Thirdly, we conducted genomic bivariate analyses between the identified microbial genes
and the performance traits DFI, ADG, CCW to obtain the genomic (co)variances. Lastly, we
used these genomic (co)variances for different breeding strategies to reduce CH4
production: 1) univariate analyses, using measured CH4p only (CH4p measured), 2)
multivariate analysis using only the most informative microbial gene abundances genetically
correlated with CH4p, i.e., microbiome-driven breeding (MDB.43), 3) multivariate analysis,
including DFI, ADG, CCW, and measured CH4p (Four traits measures), and 4) multivariate
analysis, including DFI, ADG, CCW, and predicted CH4p using microbiome-driven breeding
(Three traits & MDB.43). Three selection intensities (1.159, 1.400, and 1.755) were
considered for each strategy.
Results
We identified 43 informative microbial genes, of which 17 were positively genetically
correlated with CH4p (rgCH4p, ranging from 0.45 to 0.80) and 26 microbial genes were
negatively correlated (rgCH4p ranged from -0.32 to -0.75) with CH4p. All correlations had more
than 80% probability of being greater or lower than zero (Pr0). The heritability of these
microbial genes ranged from 0.19 to 0.50.
Of all performance traits, DFI showed strong positive genetic correlations (ranging from 0.84
to 0.93, Pr0 = 100%) with ADG, CCW, and CH4p. CCW had a marginally higher genetic
correlation with CH4p (0.61, Pr0 = 96%) than ADG (0.58, Pr0 = 96%).
Selection using microbiome-driven breeding (MDB.43) resulted in similar selection
responses to those based on measured CH4p using respiration chambers (Figure 1, -17.76 ±
2.30% vs -16.76 ± 2.26% at highest selection intensity). Including measured CH4p in the
multiple-trait model with ADG, DFI and CCW increased the accuracy of the EBVs from 0.63 ±
0.15 to 0.81 ± 0.06 and the selection response to -20.59 ± 2.13%). Replacing measured CH4p
by microbiome-driven breeding resulted in a further increase in response at -23.12 ± 2.88%.
Figure 1. Methane mitigation using different selection strategies, considering three
selection intensities (1.159, 1.400, 1.755, equivalent to selection of the best 30%, 20% and
10% of the population, respectively)
Conclusions
Microbiome-driven breeding for reduced CH4p was successfully integrated into a multipletrait model with production traits by considering all genetic and residual covariances
between microbial gene abundances and those traits. Since microbiome-driven breeding is
substantially more cost-effective than using measured CH4 emissions and provide at least
similar selection response to that obtained using the gold standard method of respiration
chambers, this methodology provides large potential to effectively reduce this highly potent
GHG gas in beef populations.
References
Roehe, R., Dewhurst, R.J., Duthie, C.A., Rooke, J.A., McKain, N., Ross, D.W., Hyslop, J.J.,
Waterhouse, A., Freeman, T.C., Watson, M. and Wallace, R.J., 2016. Bovine host genetic
variation influences rumen microbial methane production with best selection criterion for
low methane emitting and efficiently feed converting hosts based on metagenomic gene
abundance. PLOS Genetics 12, e1005846.
Martínez-Álvaro, M., Auffret, M.D., Duthie, C.A., Dewhurst, R.J., Cleveland, M.A., Watson,
M. and Roehe, R., 2022. Bovine host genome acts on rumen microbiome function linked to
methane emissions. Communications Biology 5, 350
Microbiome-driven breeding, as a cost-effective strategy to mitigate methane (CH4)
emissions, is recommended to be used in a multiple trait model with correlated production
traits, as it substantially increased the accuracy of estimation of breeding values (EBVs) and
thus enhances selection response.
Introduction
Roehe et al. (2016) found that rumen microbial gene abundances are closely linked to CH4
emissions and highlighted these as a highly informative proxy for breeding low CH4 emitting
cattle. Later, Martinez-Alvaro et al. (2022) demonstrated the effectiveness of using
microbial genes in microbiome-driven breeding to reduce CH4 yield (expressed as g of
CH4/kg of dry matter intake). In this study, we applied microbiome-driven breeding for
mitigating daily CH4 emissions (g of CH4 /day), and incorporated information from key
performance traits genetically associated with CH4 emissions, such as daily feed intake (DFI),
average daily gain (ADG) and carcass weight (CCW).
Materials and Methods
The experiment was conducted following the UK Animals Act 1986 and was approved by the
Animal Experiment Committee of SRUC. Three hundred sixty-three steers raised under the
same housing conditions on the same research farm were used in this project. The animals
were balanced for different breeds (Aberdeen Angus, Limousin, Charolais crosses and
purebred Luing) and basal diets (two diets of 520:480 and 920:80 forage:concentrate ratios).
Blood and rumen fluid samples were collected at slaughter. Microbial DNA sequence reads
from rumen fluid samples were aligned to the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes
database, resulting in the identification of 3362 microbial genes. To account for the
compositionality of microbiome data, microbial gene abundance data were transformed
using the additive log-ratio method. CH4 production was measured individually for 285 of
the 363 animals over a 48-hour period using six respiration chambers and expressed as CH4
emissions per day (CH4p).
Firstly, we conducted multiple bivariate genomic (37K SNPs) analyses to obtain genetic
variances and covariances between CH4p and microbial genes. Secondly, we identified the
most informative microbial genes that yielded the largest correlated response in CH4p.
Thirdly, we conducted genomic bivariate analyses between the identified microbial genes
and the performance traits DFI, ADG, CCW to obtain the genomic (co)variances. Lastly, we
used these genomic (co)variances for different breeding strategies to reduce CH4
production: 1) univariate analyses, using measured CH4p only (CH4p measured), 2)
multivariate analysis using only the most informative microbial gene abundances genetically
correlated with CH4p, i.e., microbiome-driven breeding (MDB.43), 3) multivariate analysis,
including DFI, ADG, CCW, and measured CH4p (Four traits measures), and 4) multivariate
analysis, including DFI, ADG, CCW, and predicted CH4p using microbiome-driven breeding
(Three traits & MDB.43). Three selection intensities (1.159, 1.400, and 1.755) were
considered for each strategy.
Results
We identified 43 informative microbial genes, of which 17 were positively genetically
correlated with CH4p (rgCH4p, ranging from 0.45 to 0.80) and 26 microbial genes were
negatively correlated (rgCH4p ranged from -0.32 to -0.75) with CH4p. All correlations had more
than 80% probability of being greater or lower than zero (Pr0). The heritability of these
microbial genes ranged from 0.19 to 0.50.
Of all performance traits, DFI showed strong positive genetic correlations (ranging from 0.84
to 0.93, Pr0 = 100%) with ADG, CCW, and CH4p. CCW had a marginally higher genetic
correlation with CH4p (0.61, Pr0 = 96%) than ADG (0.58, Pr0 = 96%).
Selection using microbiome-driven breeding (MDB.43) resulted in similar selection
responses to those based on measured CH4p using respiration chambers (Figure 1, -17.76 ±
2.30% vs -16.76 ± 2.26% at highest selection intensity). Including measured CH4p in the
multiple-trait model with ADG, DFI and CCW increased the accuracy of the EBVs from 0.63 ±
0.15 to 0.81 ± 0.06 and the selection response to -20.59 ± 2.13%). Replacing measured CH4p
by microbiome-driven breeding resulted in a further increase in response at -23.12 ± 2.88%.
Figure 1. Methane mitigation using different selection strategies, considering three
selection intensities (1.159, 1.400, 1.755, equivalent to selection of the best 30%, 20% and
10% of the population, respectively)
Conclusions
Microbiome-driven breeding for reduced CH4p was successfully integrated into a multipletrait model with production traits by considering all genetic and residual covariances
between microbial gene abundances and those traits. Since microbiome-driven breeding is
substantially more cost-effective than using measured CH4 emissions and provide at least
similar selection response to that obtained using the gold standard method of respiration
chambers, this methodology provides large potential to effectively reduce this highly potent
GHG gas in beef populations.
References
Roehe, R., Dewhurst, R.J., Duthie, C.A., Rooke, J.A., McKain, N., Ross, D.W., Hyslop, J.J.,
Waterhouse, A., Freeman, T.C., Watson, M. and Wallace, R.J., 2016. Bovine host genetic
variation influences rumen microbial methane production with best selection criterion for
low methane emitting and efficiently feed converting hosts based on metagenomic gene
abundance. PLOS Genetics 12, e1005846.
Martínez-Álvaro, M., Auffret, M.D., Duthie, C.A., Dewhurst, R.J., Cleveland, M.A., Watson,
M. and Roehe, R., 2022. Bovine host genome acts on rumen microbiome function linked to
methane emissions. Communications Biology 5, 350
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | The potential selection response of microbiome-driven breeding to mitigate methane emissions from beef cattle considering correlated production traits |
Pages | 131 |
Number of pages | 133 |
Publication status | Print publication - 14 Apr 2025 |
Keywords
- Genetics
- Microbiome
- Breeding
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The potential selection response of microbiome-driven breeding to mitigate methane emissions from beef cattle considering correlated production traits'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.-
Climate Smart Beef Genetics - Innovative approaches to the reduce environmental impact of the UK beef supply chain
Roehe, R. (PI)
1/02/23 → 31/01/27
Project: Research
-
RESAS 22-27: SRUC-c2-1 Agriculture Climate And Carbon
Rees, B. (PI), Roehe, R. (CoI), Duthie, C.-A. (CoI), Jones, S. (CoI), Eory, V. (CoI), Buckingham, S. (CoI), March, M. (CoI), Hargreaves, P. (CoI), Topp, K. (CoI), Holland, J. (CoI), Miller, G. (CoI), Houdijk, J. (CoI), Newbold, J. (CoI), MacLeod, M. (CoI) & Bell, J. (CoI)
Scottish Government: Rural & Environment Science & Analytical Services
1/04/22 → 31/03/27
Project: Research