The power of the research process: co-producing knowledge for sustainable upland estate management in Scotland

Research output: Types of ThesisDoctoral ThesisResearch

Abstract

This thesis developed and piloted a suite of sustainability indicators for assessing the extent to which upland estate management in Scotland delivers sustainability goals. In Scotland, upland areas have a unique pattern of land ownership, with much of the land divided into ‘estates’ owned by private individuals and organisations, public bodies, and non-governmental and community organisations.

Upland estate management objectives and land uses are wide-ranging - agriculture, forestry, nature conservation, property and sporting interests – set within discourses of sustainability and multifunctionality and also including new
developments in tourism, renewable energy and biodiversity conservation. The
complexity of upland estate management presents a great challenge, both
theoretically and practically.

To tackle this complexity, indicators were developed using a transdisciplinary
research approach, combining academic and non-academic knowledge within a
deliberative research process to address a ‘real world’ problem. A conceptual
framework guided the adaptation of the Delphi technique so that the indicators
were selected in a manner which: (1) increased transdisciplinary capacity; (2)
facilitated knowledge integration; and (3) enhanced the potential for social
learning. Using the adapted technique, the researcher facilitated an anonymous,
iterative research process that took place over four rounds, and involved a mixed
panel of individuals who comprised expertise in sustainability, rural and upland
land use, and estate management. A contemporary and consensual definition of
‘sustainable upland estate management’ was developed by the panel, through the identification of five ‘sustainable estate principles’ (Adapting Management;
Broadening Options; Ecosystem Thinking; Linking into Social Fabric; Thinking
beyond the Estate) and 16 corresponding indicators (‘opportunities for
sustainable estates’) within a ‘Sustainable Estates Toolkit’. The anonymous nature of the process created a safe environment for open dialogue and the researcher played an active role in stimulating participant motivation, creativity and learning.
Original languageEnglish
QualificationDoctor of Philosophy
Awarding Institution
  • University of Aberdeen
Supervisors/Advisors
  • Price, Martin, Supervisor, External person
  • Scott, Alister, Supervisor, External person
Award date1 Jan 2011
Publication statusPrint publication - 2011
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

sustainability
community organization
landownership
energy conservation
nature conservation
nongovernmental organization
forestry
tourism
learning
biodiversity
agriculture
land use
ecosystem
indicator
thesis
land
fabric
public

Keywords

  • land reform
  • Scotland
  • property
  • sustainable development
  • participation
  • social learning
  • transdisciplinary
  • Delphi

Cite this

@phdthesis{ec9e74dca7df4db4bac581adc97a724f,
title = "The power of the research process: co-producing knowledge for sustainable upland estate management in Scotland",
abstract = "This thesis developed and piloted a suite of sustainability indicators for assessing the extent to which upland estate management in Scotland delivers sustainability goals. In Scotland, upland areas have a unique pattern of land ownership, with much of the land divided into ‘estates’ owned by private individuals and organisations, public bodies, and non-governmental and community organisations.Upland estate management objectives and land uses are wide-ranging - agriculture, forestry, nature conservation, property and sporting interests – set within discourses of sustainability and multifunctionality and also including newdevelopments in tourism, renewable energy and biodiversity conservation. Thecomplexity of upland estate management presents a great challenge, boththeoretically and practically.To tackle this complexity, indicators were developed using a transdisciplinaryresearch approach, combining academic and non-academic knowledge within adeliberative research process to address a ‘real world’ problem. A conceptualframework guided the adaptation of the Delphi technique so that the indicatorswere selected in a manner which: (1) increased transdisciplinary capacity; (2)facilitated knowledge integration; and (3) enhanced the potential for sociallearning. Using the adapted technique, the researcher facilitated an anonymous,iterative research process that took place over four rounds, and involved a mixedpanel of individuals who comprised expertise in sustainability, rural and uplandland use, and estate management. A contemporary and consensual definition of‘sustainable upland estate management’ was developed by the panel, through the identification of five ‘sustainable estate principles’ (Adapting Management;Broadening Options; Ecosystem Thinking; Linking into Social Fabric; Thinkingbeyond the Estate) and 16 corresponding indicators (‘opportunities forsustainable estates’) within a ‘Sustainable Estates Toolkit’. The anonymous nature of the process created a safe environment for open dialogue and the researcher played an active role in stimulating participant motivation, creativity and learning.",
keywords = "land reform, Scotland, property, sustainable development, participation, social learning, transdisciplinary, Delphi",
author = "Jayne Glass",
year = "2011",
language = "English",
school = "University of Aberdeen",

}

TY - THES

T1 - The power of the research process: co-producing knowledge for sustainable upland estate management in Scotland

AU - Glass, Jayne

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - This thesis developed and piloted a suite of sustainability indicators for assessing the extent to which upland estate management in Scotland delivers sustainability goals. In Scotland, upland areas have a unique pattern of land ownership, with much of the land divided into ‘estates’ owned by private individuals and organisations, public bodies, and non-governmental and community organisations.Upland estate management objectives and land uses are wide-ranging - agriculture, forestry, nature conservation, property and sporting interests – set within discourses of sustainability and multifunctionality and also including newdevelopments in tourism, renewable energy and biodiversity conservation. Thecomplexity of upland estate management presents a great challenge, boththeoretically and practically.To tackle this complexity, indicators were developed using a transdisciplinaryresearch approach, combining academic and non-academic knowledge within adeliberative research process to address a ‘real world’ problem. A conceptualframework guided the adaptation of the Delphi technique so that the indicatorswere selected in a manner which: (1) increased transdisciplinary capacity; (2)facilitated knowledge integration; and (3) enhanced the potential for sociallearning. Using the adapted technique, the researcher facilitated an anonymous,iterative research process that took place over four rounds, and involved a mixedpanel of individuals who comprised expertise in sustainability, rural and uplandland use, and estate management. A contemporary and consensual definition of‘sustainable upland estate management’ was developed by the panel, through the identification of five ‘sustainable estate principles’ (Adapting Management;Broadening Options; Ecosystem Thinking; Linking into Social Fabric; Thinkingbeyond the Estate) and 16 corresponding indicators (‘opportunities forsustainable estates’) within a ‘Sustainable Estates Toolkit’. The anonymous nature of the process created a safe environment for open dialogue and the researcher played an active role in stimulating participant motivation, creativity and learning.

AB - This thesis developed and piloted a suite of sustainability indicators for assessing the extent to which upland estate management in Scotland delivers sustainability goals. In Scotland, upland areas have a unique pattern of land ownership, with much of the land divided into ‘estates’ owned by private individuals and organisations, public bodies, and non-governmental and community organisations.Upland estate management objectives and land uses are wide-ranging - agriculture, forestry, nature conservation, property and sporting interests – set within discourses of sustainability and multifunctionality and also including newdevelopments in tourism, renewable energy and biodiversity conservation. Thecomplexity of upland estate management presents a great challenge, boththeoretically and practically.To tackle this complexity, indicators were developed using a transdisciplinaryresearch approach, combining academic and non-academic knowledge within adeliberative research process to address a ‘real world’ problem. A conceptualframework guided the adaptation of the Delphi technique so that the indicatorswere selected in a manner which: (1) increased transdisciplinary capacity; (2)facilitated knowledge integration; and (3) enhanced the potential for sociallearning. Using the adapted technique, the researcher facilitated an anonymous,iterative research process that took place over four rounds, and involved a mixedpanel of individuals who comprised expertise in sustainability, rural and uplandland use, and estate management. A contemporary and consensual definition of‘sustainable upland estate management’ was developed by the panel, through the identification of five ‘sustainable estate principles’ (Adapting Management;Broadening Options; Ecosystem Thinking; Linking into Social Fabric; Thinkingbeyond the Estate) and 16 corresponding indicators (‘opportunities forsustainable estates’) within a ‘Sustainable Estates Toolkit’. The anonymous nature of the process created a safe environment for open dialogue and the researcher played an active role in stimulating participant motivation, creativity and learning.

KW - land reform

KW - Scotland

KW - property

KW - sustainable development

KW - participation

KW - social learning

KW - transdisciplinary

KW - Delphi

M3 - Doctoral Thesis

ER -