The risk of foot and mouth disease transmission posed by public access to the countryside during an outbreak

Harriet Auty*, Dominic Mellor, George Gunn, Lisa A. Boden

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

14 Citations (Scopus)
63 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

During the 2001 UK FMD outbreak, local authorities restricted rural access to try to prevent further disease spread by people and animals, which had major socio-economic consequences for rural communities. This study describes the results of qualitative veterinary risk assessments to assess the likelihood of different recreational activities causing new outbreaks of foot and mouth disease, as part of contingency planning for future outbreaks. For most activities, the likelihood of causing new outbreaks of foot and mouth disease is considered to vary from very low to medium depending on the control zone (which is based on distance to the nearest infected premises), assuming compliance with specified mitigation strategies. The likelihood of new outbreaks associated with hunting, shooting, stalking, and equestrian activities is considered to be greater. There are areas of significant uncertainty associated with data paucity, particularly regarding the likelihood of transmission via fomites. This study provides scientific evidence to underpin refinement of rural access management plans and inform decision-making in future disease outbreaks.

Original languageEnglish
Article number381
JournalFrontiers in Veterinary Science
Volume6
Early online date5 Nov 2019
DOIs
Publication statusFirst published - 5 Nov 2019

Keywords

  • fomites
  • foot and mouth disease
  • policy
  • risk assessment
  • rural access
  • transmission

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The risk of foot and mouth disease transmission posed by public access to the countryside during an outbreak'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this