The role of heritage tourism in attracting “active” in-migrants to “low amenity” rural areas

Ana Vuin, Doris Anna Carson*, Dean Bradley Carson, Jaimee Garrett

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

33 Citations (Scopus)


Tourism can influence in-migration to rural areas by enhancing the attractiveness of rural communities and providing opportunities for employment, entrepreneurship and volunteer engagement appealing to in-migrants. Much research on the rural tourism-migration nexus has focused on “high amenity” areas characterized by scenic environments and well-developed tourism and service infrastructures. Many communities in inland Australia, however, are in “low amenity” areas where tourism opportunities are limited to exploiting industrial and cultural heritage assets. This article examines the role of heritage tourism in facilitating in-migration to such areas based on interviews with in-migrants to three communities in South Australia’s Mid-North, focusing on the experiences of “active” in-migrants who get economically or socially involved in their new communities. Findings suggest heritage tourism minimally affected migration decisions. Key attractors were housing, employment, cost of living and easy access to the city. Business opportunities in tourism were attractors where the tourism industry was relatively well developed. Overall, the factors influencing in-migration differed among communities suggesting locally, not regionally, focused place marketing strategies are required to target in-migrants.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)134-153
Number of pages20
JournalRural Society
Issue number2
Publication statusFirst published - 29 Jun 2016
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.


  • amenities
  • heritage tourism
  • low amenity areas
  • rural in-migration
  • rural lifestyle


Dive into the research topics of 'The role of heritage tourism in attracting “active” in-migrants to “low amenity” rural areas'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this