The use of biogeochemical models to evaluate mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions from managed grasslands

R Sándor, F Ehrhardt, L Brilli, M Carozzi, S Recous, P Smith, V Snow, J-F Soussana, CD Dorich, K Fuchs, N Fitton, K Gongadze, K Klumpp, M Liebig, R Martin, L Merbold, PCD Newton, RM Rees, S Rolinski, G Bellocchi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Simulation models quantify the impacts on carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) cycling in grassland systems caused by changes in management practices. To support agricultural policies, it is however important to contrast the responses of alternative models, which can differ greatly in their treatment of key processes and in their response to management. We applied eight biogeochemical models at five grassland sites (in France, New Zealand, Switzerland, United Kingdom and United States) to compare the sensitivity of modelled C and N fluxes to changes in the density of grazing animals (from 100% to 50% of the original livestock densities), also in combination with decreasing N fertilization levels (reduced to zero from the initial levels). Simulated multi-model median values indicated that input reduction would lead to an increase in the C sink strength (negative net ecosystem C exchange) in intensive grazing systems: −64 ± 74 g C m−2 yr−1 (animal density reduction) and −81 ± 74 g C m−2 yr−1 (N and animal density reduction), against the baseline of −30.5 ± 69.5 g C m−2 yr−1 (LSU [livestock units] ≥ 0.76 ha−1 yr−1). Simulations also indicated a strong effect of N fertilizer reduction on N fluxes, e.g. N2O-N emissions decreased from 0.34 ± 0.22 (baseline) to 0.1 ± 0.05 g N m−2 yr−1 (no N fertilization). Simulated decline in grazing intensity had only limited impact on the N balance. The simulated pattern of enteric methane emissions was dominated by high model-to-model variability. The reduction in simulated offtake (animal intake + cut biomass) led to a doubling in net primary production per animal (increased by 11.6 ± 8.1 t C LSU−1 yr−1 across sites). The highest N2O-N intensities (N2O-N/offtake) were simulated at mown and extensively grazed arid sites. We show the possibility of using grassland models to determine sound mitigation practices while quantifying the uncertainties associated with the simulated outputs.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)292 - 306
Number of pages15
JournalScience of the Total Environment
Volume642
Early online date12 Jun 2018
DOIs
Publication statusFirst published - 12 Jun 2018

Fingerprint

greenhouse gas
mitigation
grassland
animal
grazing
livestock
agricultural policy
net primary production
simulation
management practice
methane
fertilizer
ecosystem
nitrogen
carbon
biomass

Bibliographical note

2047560

Keywords

  • GHG emission intensity
  • Livestock density
  • Nitrogen fertilization
  • Process-based model
  • Sensitivity analysis

Cite this

Sándor, R ; Ehrhardt, F ; Brilli, L ; Carozzi, M ; Recous, S ; Smith, P ; Snow, V ; Soussana, J-F ; Dorich, CD ; Fuchs, K ; Fitton, N ; Gongadze, K ; Klumpp, K ; Liebig, M ; Martin, R ; Merbold, L ; Newton, PCD ; Rees, RM ; Rolinski, S ; Bellocchi, G. / The use of biogeochemical models to evaluate mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions from managed grasslands. In: Science of the Total Environment. 2018 ; Vol. 642. pp. 292 - 306.
@article{725825d6f70040ceb457885d5207439e,
title = "The use of biogeochemical models to evaluate mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions from managed grasslands",
abstract = "Simulation models quantify the impacts on carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) cycling in grassland systems caused by changes in management practices. To support agricultural policies, it is however important to contrast the responses of alternative models, which can differ greatly in their treatment of key processes and in their response to management. We applied eight biogeochemical models at five grassland sites (in France, New Zealand, Switzerland, United Kingdom and United States) to compare the sensitivity of modelled C and N fluxes to changes in the density of grazing animals (from 100{\%} to 50{\%} of the original livestock densities), also in combination with decreasing N fertilization levels (reduced to zero from the initial levels). Simulated multi-model median values indicated that input reduction would lead to an increase in the C sink strength (negative net ecosystem C exchange) in intensive grazing systems: −64 ± 74 g C m−2 yr−1 (animal density reduction) and −81 ± 74 g C m−2 yr−1 (N and animal density reduction), against the baseline of −30.5 ± 69.5 g C m−2 yr−1 (LSU [livestock units] ≥ 0.76 ha−1 yr−1). Simulations also indicated a strong effect of N fertilizer reduction on N fluxes, e.g. N2O-N emissions decreased from 0.34 ± 0.22 (baseline) to 0.1 ± 0.05 g N m−2 yr−1 (no N fertilization). Simulated decline in grazing intensity had only limited impact on the N balance. The simulated pattern of enteric methane emissions was dominated by high model-to-model variability. The reduction in simulated offtake (animal intake + cut biomass) led to a doubling in net primary production per animal (increased by 11.6 ± 8.1 t C LSU−1 yr−1 across sites). The highest N2O-N intensities (N2O-N/offtake) were simulated at mown and extensively grazed arid sites. We show the possibility of using grassland models to determine sound mitigation practices while quantifying the uncertainties associated with the simulated outputs.",
keywords = "GHG emission intensity, Livestock density, Nitrogen fertilization, Process-based model, Sensitivity analysis",
author = "R S{\'a}ndor and F Ehrhardt and L Brilli and M Carozzi and S Recous and P Smith and V Snow and J-F Soussana and CD Dorich and K Fuchs and N Fitton and K Gongadze and K Klumpp and M Liebig and R Martin and L Merbold and PCD Newton and RM Rees and S Rolinski and G Bellocchi",
note = "2047560",
year = "2018",
month = "6",
day = "12",
doi = "10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.06.020",
language = "English",
volume = "642",
pages = "292 -- 306",
journal = "Science of the Total Environment",
issn = "0048-9697",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

Sándor, R, Ehrhardt, F, Brilli, L, Carozzi, M, Recous, S, Smith, P, Snow, V, Soussana, J-F, Dorich, CD, Fuchs, K, Fitton, N, Gongadze, K, Klumpp, K, Liebig, M, Martin, R, Merbold, L, Newton, PCD, Rees, RM, Rolinski, S & Bellocchi, G 2018, 'The use of biogeochemical models to evaluate mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions from managed grasslands' Science of the Total Environment, vol. 642, pp. 292 - 306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.06.020

The use of biogeochemical models to evaluate mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions from managed grasslands. / Sándor, R; Ehrhardt, F; Brilli, L; Carozzi, M; Recous, S; Smith, P; Snow, V; Soussana, J-F; Dorich, CD; Fuchs, K; Fitton, N; Gongadze, K; Klumpp, K; Liebig, M; Martin, R; Merbold, L; Newton, PCD; Rees, RM; Rolinski, S; Bellocchi, G.

In: Science of the Total Environment, Vol. 642, 12.06.2018, p. 292 - 306.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The use of biogeochemical models to evaluate mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions from managed grasslands

AU - Sándor, R

AU - Ehrhardt, F

AU - Brilli, L

AU - Carozzi, M

AU - Recous, S

AU - Smith, P

AU - Snow, V

AU - Soussana, J-F

AU - Dorich, CD

AU - Fuchs, K

AU - Fitton, N

AU - Gongadze, K

AU - Klumpp, K

AU - Liebig, M

AU - Martin, R

AU - Merbold, L

AU - Newton, PCD

AU - Rees, RM

AU - Rolinski, S

AU - Bellocchi, G

N1 - 2047560

PY - 2018/6/12

Y1 - 2018/6/12

N2 - Simulation models quantify the impacts on carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) cycling in grassland systems caused by changes in management practices. To support agricultural policies, it is however important to contrast the responses of alternative models, which can differ greatly in their treatment of key processes and in their response to management. We applied eight biogeochemical models at five grassland sites (in France, New Zealand, Switzerland, United Kingdom and United States) to compare the sensitivity of modelled C and N fluxes to changes in the density of grazing animals (from 100% to 50% of the original livestock densities), also in combination with decreasing N fertilization levels (reduced to zero from the initial levels). Simulated multi-model median values indicated that input reduction would lead to an increase in the C sink strength (negative net ecosystem C exchange) in intensive grazing systems: −64 ± 74 g C m−2 yr−1 (animal density reduction) and −81 ± 74 g C m−2 yr−1 (N and animal density reduction), against the baseline of −30.5 ± 69.5 g C m−2 yr−1 (LSU [livestock units] ≥ 0.76 ha−1 yr−1). Simulations also indicated a strong effect of N fertilizer reduction on N fluxes, e.g. N2O-N emissions decreased from 0.34 ± 0.22 (baseline) to 0.1 ± 0.05 g N m−2 yr−1 (no N fertilization). Simulated decline in grazing intensity had only limited impact on the N balance. The simulated pattern of enteric methane emissions was dominated by high model-to-model variability. The reduction in simulated offtake (animal intake + cut biomass) led to a doubling in net primary production per animal (increased by 11.6 ± 8.1 t C LSU−1 yr−1 across sites). The highest N2O-N intensities (N2O-N/offtake) were simulated at mown and extensively grazed arid sites. We show the possibility of using grassland models to determine sound mitigation practices while quantifying the uncertainties associated with the simulated outputs.

AB - Simulation models quantify the impacts on carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) cycling in grassland systems caused by changes in management practices. To support agricultural policies, it is however important to contrast the responses of alternative models, which can differ greatly in their treatment of key processes and in their response to management. We applied eight biogeochemical models at five grassland sites (in France, New Zealand, Switzerland, United Kingdom and United States) to compare the sensitivity of modelled C and N fluxes to changes in the density of grazing animals (from 100% to 50% of the original livestock densities), also in combination with decreasing N fertilization levels (reduced to zero from the initial levels). Simulated multi-model median values indicated that input reduction would lead to an increase in the C sink strength (negative net ecosystem C exchange) in intensive grazing systems: −64 ± 74 g C m−2 yr−1 (animal density reduction) and −81 ± 74 g C m−2 yr−1 (N and animal density reduction), against the baseline of −30.5 ± 69.5 g C m−2 yr−1 (LSU [livestock units] ≥ 0.76 ha−1 yr−1). Simulations also indicated a strong effect of N fertilizer reduction on N fluxes, e.g. N2O-N emissions decreased from 0.34 ± 0.22 (baseline) to 0.1 ± 0.05 g N m−2 yr−1 (no N fertilization). Simulated decline in grazing intensity had only limited impact on the N balance. The simulated pattern of enteric methane emissions was dominated by high model-to-model variability. The reduction in simulated offtake (animal intake + cut biomass) led to a doubling in net primary production per animal (increased by 11.6 ± 8.1 t C LSU−1 yr−1 across sites). The highest N2O-N intensities (N2O-N/offtake) were simulated at mown and extensively grazed arid sites. We show the possibility of using grassland models to determine sound mitigation practices while quantifying the uncertainties associated with the simulated outputs.

KW - GHG emission intensity

KW - Livestock density

KW - Nitrogen fertilization

KW - Process-based model

KW - Sensitivity analysis

UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/biogeochemical-models-evaluate-mitigation-greenhouse-gas-emissions-managed-grasslands-1

U2 - 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.06.020

DO - 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.06.020

M3 - Article

VL - 642

SP - 292

EP - 306

JO - Science of the Total Environment

JF - Science of the Total Environment

SN - 0048-9697

ER -