UK peatland restoration: some economic arithmetic

A Moxey, D Moran

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Over 80% of UK peatlands are degraded to some extent and their widespread restoration could contribute to meeting various climate change, water quality and biodiversity policy challenges. Economic analysis of costs and benefits is, however, hampered by scientific uncertainty and a lack of data on biophysical conditions as well as the impacts and costs of restoration. This paper presents a simple ‘ready-reckoner’ of possible net economic benefits under different combinations of simplifying ‘what if?’ assumptions for key restoration parameters. The results strongly suggest that even a narrow focus on carbon benefits alone is sufficient to justify restoration in many cases, and the inclusion of possible additional non-carbon benefits reinforces this. However, results are sensitive to assumptions and better data for, in particular, restoration costs associated with modest emission savings from lightly degraded sites would be helpful. Some other areas for further research are also identified. © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)114 - 120
Number of pages7
JournalScience of the Total Environment
Volume484
DOIs
Publication statusFirst published - 2014

Fingerprint

peatland
economics
economic analysis
cost
savings
biodiversity
water quality
climate change
restoration
carbon

Bibliographical note

1028477

Keywords

  • Carbon emissions
  • Cost benefit analysis
  • Economics
  • Peatland restoration
  • Ready reckoner

Cite this

Moxey, A ; Moran, D. / UK peatland restoration: some economic arithmetic. In: Science of the Total Environment. 2014 ; Vol. 484. pp. 114 - 120.
@article{f37f8e12fc07466e9785f4f5ee796473,
title = "UK peatland restoration: some economic arithmetic",
abstract = "Over 80{\%} of UK peatlands are degraded to some extent and their widespread restoration could contribute to meeting various climate change, water quality and biodiversity policy challenges. Economic analysis of costs and benefits is, however, hampered by scientific uncertainty and a lack of data on biophysical conditions as well as the impacts and costs of restoration. This paper presents a simple ‘ready-reckoner’ of possible net economic benefits under different combinations of simplifying ‘what if?’ assumptions for key restoration parameters. The results strongly suggest that even a narrow focus on carbon benefits alone is sufficient to justify restoration in many cases, and the inclusion of possible additional non-carbon benefits reinforces this. However, results are sensitive to assumptions and better data for, in particular, restoration costs associated with modest emission savings from lightly degraded sites would be helpful. Some other areas for further research are also identified. {\circledC} 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.",
keywords = "Carbon emissions, Cost benefit analysis, Economics, Peatland restoration, Ready reckoner",
author = "A Moxey and D Moran",
note = "1028477",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.03.033",
language = "English",
volume = "484",
pages = "114 -- 120",
journal = "Science of the Total Environment",
issn = "0048-9697",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

UK peatland restoration: some economic arithmetic. / Moxey, A; Moran, D.

In: Science of the Total Environment, Vol. 484, 2014, p. 114 - 120.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - UK peatland restoration: some economic arithmetic

AU - Moxey, A

AU - Moran, D

N1 - 1028477

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Over 80% of UK peatlands are degraded to some extent and their widespread restoration could contribute to meeting various climate change, water quality and biodiversity policy challenges. Economic analysis of costs and benefits is, however, hampered by scientific uncertainty and a lack of data on biophysical conditions as well as the impacts and costs of restoration. This paper presents a simple ‘ready-reckoner’ of possible net economic benefits under different combinations of simplifying ‘what if?’ assumptions for key restoration parameters. The results strongly suggest that even a narrow focus on carbon benefits alone is sufficient to justify restoration in many cases, and the inclusion of possible additional non-carbon benefits reinforces this. However, results are sensitive to assumptions and better data for, in particular, restoration costs associated with modest emission savings from lightly degraded sites would be helpful. Some other areas for further research are also identified. © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

AB - Over 80% of UK peatlands are degraded to some extent and their widespread restoration could contribute to meeting various climate change, water quality and biodiversity policy challenges. Economic analysis of costs and benefits is, however, hampered by scientific uncertainty and a lack of data on biophysical conditions as well as the impacts and costs of restoration. This paper presents a simple ‘ready-reckoner’ of possible net economic benefits under different combinations of simplifying ‘what if?’ assumptions for key restoration parameters. The results strongly suggest that even a narrow focus on carbon benefits alone is sufficient to justify restoration in many cases, and the inclusion of possible additional non-carbon benefits reinforces this. However, results are sensitive to assumptions and better data for, in particular, restoration costs associated with modest emission savings from lightly degraded sites would be helpful. Some other areas for further research are also identified. © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

KW - Carbon emissions

KW - Cost benefit analysis

KW - Economics

KW - Peatland restoration

KW - Ready reckoner

U2 - 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.03.033

DO - 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.03.033

M3 - Article

VL - 484

SP - 114

EP - 120

JO - Science of the Total Environment

JF - Science of the Total Environment

SN - 0048-9697

ER -