Abstract
Over 80% of UK peatlands are degraded to some extent and their widespread restoration could contribute to
meeting various climate change, water quality and biodiversity policy challenges. Economic analysis of costs
and benefits is, however, hampered by scientific uncertainty and a lack of data on biophysical conditions as
well as the impacts and costs of restoration. This paper presents a simple ‘ready-reckoner’ of possible net economic
benefits under different combinations of simplifying ‘what if?’ assumptions for key restoration parameters.
The results strongly suggest that even a narrow focus on carbon benefits alone is sufficient to justify
restoration in many cases, and the inclusion of possible additional non-carbon benefits reinforces this. However,
results are sensitive to assumptions and better data for, in particular, restoration costs associated with modest
emission savings from lightly degraded sites would be helpful. Some other areas for further research are also
identified.
© 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 114 - 120 |
Number of pages | 7 |
Journal | Science of the Total Environment |
Volume | 484 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | First published - 2014 |
Bibliographical note
1028477Keywords
- Carbon emissions
- Cost benefit analysis
- Economics
- Peatland restoration
- Ready reckoner