Uplandia: making better policy in complex upland systems. Final report.

GB Stewart; M Glendell; R McMorran; M Troldborg; Z Gagkas; P Ovando; M Roberts; CM Maynard; AW Williams; G Clay; MSR Reed

Uplandia: making better policy in complex upland systems. Final report.

GB Stewart^*, M Glendell, R McMorran, M Troldborg, Z Gagkas, P Ovando, M Roberts, CM Maynard, AW Williams, G Clay, MSR Reed

^*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Book/Report/Policy Brief/Technical Brief › Research report › peer-review

83 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This project developed a Bayesian Belief Network for English uplands, representing key system components and relationships on the basis of the best available evidence. Given the policy relevance of managed and wild fire, a rapid evidence synthesis was conducted to assess factors influencing the behaviour of peatland users and managers in relation to wildfire, which informed a wildfire sub-model. By considering four scenarios, it was possible to consider how changes in the availability of public funding and/or carbon finance might alter the overall utility of uplands and provision of ecosystem services. users and managers in relation to wildfire, which informed a wildfire sub- model. By considering four scenarios (below), it was possible to consider how changes in the availability of public funding and/or carbon finance might alter the overall utility of uplands and provision of specific ecosystem services. users and managers in relation to wildfire, which informed a wildfire sub- model. By considering four scenarios (below), it was possible to consider how changes in the availability of public funding and/or carbon finance might alter the overall utility of uplands and provision of specific ecosystem services. users and managers in relation to wildfire, which informed a wildfire sub- model. By considering four scenarios (below), it was possible to consider how changes in the availability of public funding and/or carbon finance might alter the overall utility of uplands and provision of specific ecosystem services.

Original language	English
Commissioning body	Defra and Natural England
Number of pages	68
Publication status	Print publication - 7 May 2021

Bibliographical note

This report should be cited as: Stewart GB, Glendell M, McMorran R, Troldborg M, Gagkas Z, Ovando P, Roberts M, Maynard C, Williams A, Clay G, Reed MS (2021) Uplandia: making better policy in complex upland systems. Final Report, Defra and Natural England.

Access to Document

3618DD12-78D8-4375-8DEA-442C0A779F6CFinal published version, 11.4 MBLicence: CC BY-NC

https://eprints.ncl.ac.uk/274791

1 Finished

Uplandia: Systems modelling for evidence-informed peatland policy
Reed, M. (PI)
21/12/20 → 31/03/21
Project: Research

1 Policy Brief

Uplandia: making better policy in complex upland systems
Reed, M., 4 May 2021, 7 p.
Research output: Book/Report/Policy Brief/Technical Brief › Policy Brief

File

Cite this

@book{3273ebb9707346b98d699748fc901636,

title = "Uplandia: making better policy in complex upland systems. Final report.",

abstract = "This project developed a Bayesian Belief Network for English uplands, representing key system components and relationships on the basis of the best available evidence. Given the policy relevance of managed and wild fire, a rapid evidence synthesis was conducted to assess factors influencing the behaviour of peatland users and managers in relation to wildfire, which informed a wildfire sub-model. By considering four scenarios, it was possible to consider how changes in the availability of public funding and/or carbon finance might alter the overall utility of uplands and provision of ecosystem services. users and managers in relation to wildfire, which informed a wildfire sub- model. By considering four scenarios (below), it was possible to consider how changes in the availability of public funding and/or carbon finance might alter the overall utility of uplands and provision of specific ecosystem services. users and managers in relation to wildfire, which informed a wildfire sub- model. By considering four scenarios (below), it was possible to consider how changes in the availability of public funding and/or carbon finance might alter the overall utility of uplands and provision of specific ecosystem services. users and managers in relation to wildfire, which informed a wildfire sub- model. By considering four scenarios (below), it was possible to consider how changes in the availability of public funding and/or carbon finance might alter the overall utility of uplands and provision of specific ecosystem services.",

author = "GB Stewart and M Glendell and R McMorran and M Troldborg and Z Gagkas and P Ovando and M Roberts and CM Maynard and AW Williams and G Clay and MSR Reed",

note = "This report should be cited as: Stewart GB, Glendell M, McMorran R, Troldborg M, Gagkas Z, Ovando P, Roberts M, Maynard C, Williams A, Clay G, Reed MS (2021) Uplandia: making better policy in complex upland systems. Final Report, Defra and Natural England.",

year = "2021",

month = may,

day = "7",

language = "English",

}

TY - BOOK

T1 - Uplandia: making better policy in complex upland systems. Final report.

AU - Stewart, GB

AU - Glendell, M

AU - McMorran, R

AU - Troldborg, M

AU - Gagkas, Z

AU - Ovando, P

AU - Roberts, M

AU - Maynard, CM

AU - Williams, AW

AU - Clay, G

AU - Reed, MSR

N1 - This report should be cited as: Stewart GB, Glendell M, McMorran R, Troldborg M, Gagkas Z, Ovando P, Roberts M, Maynard C, Williams A, Clay G, Reed MS (2021) Uplandia: making better policy in complex upland systems. Final Report, Defra and Natural England.

PY - 2021/5/7

Y1 - 2021/5/7

N2 - This project developed a Bayesian Belief Network for English uplands, representing key system components and relationships on the basis of the best available evidence. Given the policy relevance of managed and wild fire, a rapid evidence synthesis was conducted to assess factors influencing the behaviour of peatland users and managers in relation to wildfire, which informed a wildfire sub-model. By considering four scenarios, it was possible to consider how changes in the availability of public funding and/or carbon finance might alter the overall utility of uplands and provision of ecosystem services. users and managers in relation to wildfire, which informed a wildfire sub- model. By considering four scenarios (below), it was possible to consider how changes in the availability of public funding and/or carbon finance might alter the overall utility of uplands and provision of specific ecosystem services. users and managers in relation to wildfire, which informed a wildfire sub- model. By considering four scenarios (below), it was possible to consider how changes in the availability of public funding and/or carbon finance might alter the overall utility of uplands and provision of specific ecosystem services. users and managers in relation to wildfire, which informed a wildfire sub- model. By considering four scenarios (below), it was possible to consider how changes in the availability of public funding and/or carbon finance might alter the overall utility of uplands and provision of specific ecosystem services.

AB - This project developed a Bayesian Belief Network for English uplands, representing key system components and relationships on the basis of the best available evidence. Given the policy relevance of managed and wild fire, a rapid evidence synthesis was conducted to assess factors influencing the behaviour of peatland users and managers in relation to wildfire, which informed a wildfire sub-model. By considering four scenarios, it was possible to consider how changes in the availability of public funding and/or carbon finance might alter the overall utility of uplands and provision of ecosystem services. users and managers in relation to wildfire, which informed a wildfire sub- model. By considering four scenarios (below), it was possible to consider how changes in the availability of public funding and/or carbon finance might alter the overall utility of uplands and provision of specific ecosystem services. users and managers in relation to wildfire, which informed a wildfire sub- model. By considering four scenarios (below), it was possible to consider how changes in the availability of public funding and/or carbon finance might alter the overall utility of uplands and provision of specific ecosystem services. users and managers in relation to wildfire, which informed a wildfire sub- model. By considering four scenarios (below), it was possible to consider how changes in the availability of public funding and/or carbon finance might alter the overall utility of uplands and provision of specific ecosystem services.

M3 - Research report

BT - Uplandia: making better policy in complex upland systems. Final report.

ER -

Uplandia: making better policy in complex upland systems. Final report.

Abstract

Bibliographical note

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Projects

Uplandia: Systems modelling for evidence-informed peatland policy

Research output

Uplandia: making better policy in complex upland systems

Cite this