Use or delight? History of conflicting hill land uses in Scotland - a review

C Morgan-Davies, R Wilson, A Waterhouse

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

8 Citations (Scopus)
133 Downloads (Pure)


The hill and mountain areas in Europe are multi-faceted and places of differing and often conflicting land activities. Scotland provides a good example of a well described history of land uses with conflicting provision and management objectives. Using Scotland’s hill areas as a case study, the article argues that using a dual interacting dichotomy of “use” of the land versus “delight” from the land, and of management for “a few” towards management for “the many”, could be used to describe and analyse the past and present conflicts over land activities. This article explores the political influences and historic evolution of hill farming and other associated hill land activities or interests, as well as the underlying conflicts that affect them. Most of these conflicts are grounded in historical, political and economic priorities, divergent management objectives and conflicting stakeholders’ views. The article further argues these conflicts could be better understood by an appreciation of the different elements of “use” and “delight”, and of the different views and uses of interested parties. By asking both “what is it for?” and “who is it for?” a dual dichotomy approach was found to be useful to review these intricate issues overtime.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)98 - 122
Number of pages25
JournalScottish Geographical Journal
Issue number2
Publication statusFirst published - 2015

Bibliographical note



  • Conflicts
  • Conservation
  • Farming
  • Forestry
  • Game
  • Hill land


Dive into the research topics of 'Use or delight? History of conflicting hill land uses in Scotland - a review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this