Valuing water quality improvements from peatland restoration: evidence and challenges

J Martin-Ortega, TEH Allott, K Glenk, M Schaafsma

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

19 Citations (Scopus)
1 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

There is evidence that damaged peatlands can negatively affect the delivery of water related ecosystem services. There is interest in peatland restoration to meet different regulatory targets, including the Water Framework Directive (WFD). A comprehensive assessment of the economic benefits of restoration is missing. This paper synthesises hydrological and bio-geochemical knowledge on peatland restoration, as well as insights in the monetary valuation of water quality improvements in freshwater systems. This is used to identify challenges in valuing water quality related benefits from peatland restoration. The paper concludes that there is strong evidence for rapid ecological responses to peatland restoration related to reduced suspended sediment loads, and sufficient evidence that re-wetting will prevent further decline in water quality. Two main challenges arise for valuation: (1) incomplete evidence of effects of restoration on final ecosystem services and benefits, and (2) the spatial and temporal differences in peatlands’ responses. We suggest developing valuation scenarios on a case-by-case basis, using best available evidence of the changes associated with restoration described by a categorization of peatland status similar to the ecological status ladders developed for the WFD. These would need to be tested with the public and should include an element of uncertainty in services provision.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)34 - 43
Number of pages10
JournalEcosystem Services
Volume9
DOIs
Publication statusPrint publication - 2014

Fingerprint

peatland
valuation
ecosystem service
water quality
service provision
water quality improvement
restoration
wetting
water
suspended sediment
economics

Bibliographical note

1023311
1023337

Keywords

  • Blanket raised bogs
  • Ecosystem services
  • Non-market values
  • Water Framework Directive

Cite this

Martin-Ortega, J ; Allott, TEH ; Glenk, K ; Schaafsma, M. / Valuing water quality improvements from peatland restoration: evidence and challenges. In: Ecosystem Services. 2014 ; Vol. 9. pp. 34 - 43.
@article{3eec9bfd9b154b42a0404a6d5b91c86f,
title = "Valuing water quality improvements from peatland restoration: evidence and challenges",
abstract = "There is evidence that damaged peatlands can negatively affect the delivery of water related ecosystem services. There is interest in peatland restoration to meet different regulatory targets, including the Water Framework Directive (WFD). A comprehensive assessment of the economic benefits of restoration is missing. This paper synthesises hydrological and bio-geochemical knowledge on peatland restoration, as well as insights in the monetary valuation of water quality improvements in freshwater systems. This is used to identify challenges in valuing water quality related benefits from peatland restoration. The paper concludes that there is strong evidence for rapid ecological responses to peatland restoration related to reduced suspended sediment loads, and sufficient evidence that re-wetting will prevent further decline in water quality. Two main challenges arise for valuation: (1) incomplete evidence of effects of restoration on final ecosystem services and benefits, and (2) the spatial and temporal differences in peatlands’ responses. We suggest developing valuation scenarios on a case-by-case basis, using best available evidence of the changes associated with restoration described by a categorization of peatland status similar to the ecological status ladders developed for the WFD. These would need to be tested with the public and should include an element of uncertainty in services provision.",
keywords = "Blanket raised bogs, Ecosystem services, Non-market values, Water Framework Directive",
author = "J Martin-Ortega and TEH Allott and K Glenk and M Schaafsma",
note = "1023311 1023337",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.06.007",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
pages = "34 -- 43",
journal = "Ecosystem Services",
issn = "2212-0416",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

Valuing water quality improvements from peatland restoration: evidence and challenges. / Martin-Ortega, J; Allott, TEH; Glenk, K; Schaafsma, M.

In: Ecosystem Services, Vol. 9, 2014, p. 34 - 43.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Valuing water quality improvements from peatland restoration: evidence and challenges

AU - Martin-Ortega, J

AU - Allott, TEH

AU - Glenk, K

AU - Schaafsma, M

N1 - 1023311 1023337

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - There is evidence that damaged peatlands can negatively affect the delivery of water related ecosystem services. There is interest in peatland restoration to meet different regulatory targets, including the Water Framework Directive (WFD). A comprehensive assessment of the economic benefits of restoration is missing. This paper synthesises hydrological and bio-geochemical knowledge on peatland restoration, as well as insights in the monetary valuation of water quality improvements in freshwater systems. This is used to identify challenges in valuing water quality related benefits from peatland restoration. The paper concludes that there is strong evidence for rapid ecological responses to peatland restoration related to reduced suspended sediment loads, and sufficient evidence that re-wetting will prevent further decline in water quality. Two main challenges arise for valuation: (1) incomplete evidence of effects of restoration on final ecosystem services and benefits, and (2) the spatial and temporal differences in peatlands’ responses. We suggest developing valuation scenarios on a case-by-case basis, using best available evidence of the changes associated with restoration described by a categorization of peatland status similar to the ecological status ladders developed for the WFD. These would need to be tested with the public and should include an element of uncertainty in services provision.

AB - There is evidence that damaged peatlands can negatively affect the delivery of water related ecosystem services. There is interest in peatland restoration to meet different regulatory targets, including the Water Framework Directive (WFD). A comprehensive assessment of the economic benefits of restoration is missing. This paper synthesises hydrological and bio-geochemical knowledge on peatland restoration, as well as insights in the monetary valuation of water quality improvements in freshwater systems. This is used to identify challenges in valuing water quality related benefits from peatland restoration. The paper concludes that there is strong evidence for rapid ecological responses to peatland restoration related to reduced suspended sediment loads, and sufficient evidence that re-wetting will prevent further decline in water quality. Two main challenges arise for valuation: (1) incomplete evidence of effects of restoration on final ecosystem services and benefits, and (2) the spatial and temporal differences in peatlands’ responses. We suggest developing valuation scenarios on a case-by-case basis, using best available evidence of the changes associated with restoration described by a categorization of peatland status similar to the ecological status ladders developed for the WFD. These would need to be tested with the public and should include an element of uncertainty in services provision.

KW - Blanket raised bogs

KW - Ecosystem services

KW - Non-market values

KW - Water Framework Directive

U2 - 10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.06.007

DO - 10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.06.007

M3 - Article

VL - 9

SP - 34

EP - 43

JO - Ecosystem Services

JF - Ecosystem Services

SN - 2212-0416

ER -