TY - JOUR
T1 - Welfare Indicators for Aquaculture Research: Toolboxes for Five Farmed European Fish Species
AU - Noble, Chris
AU - Abbink, Wout
AU - Alvestad, René
AU - Ardó, László
AU - Bégout, Marie‐Laure
AU - Bloecher, Nina
AU - Burgerhout, Erik
AU - Calduch‐Giner, Josep
AU - Chivite‐Alcalde, Mauro
AU - Císař, Petr
AU - Durland, Evan
AU - Espmark, Åsa M.
AU - Falconer, Lynne
AU - Føre, Martin
AU - Georgopoulou, Dimitra G.
AU - Heia, Karsten
AU - Helberg, Gaute A. N.
AU - Izquierdo Gomez, David
AU - Johansen, Lill‐Heidi
AU - Johansson, Gunhild Seljehaug
AU - Jónsdóttir, Kristbjörg Edda
AU - Kolarevic, Jelena
AU - Krasnov, Aleksei
AU - Kumaran, Santhosh K.
AU - Kvæstad, Bjarne
AU - Larsson, Thomas
AU - Lazado, Carlo C.
AU - Madaro, Angelico
AU - Moroni, Federico
AU - Måge, Ingrid
AU - Nilsson, Jonatan
AU - Ortega, Samuel
AU - Papandroulakis, Nikos
AU - Pérez‐Sánchez, Jaume
AU - Prentice, Pamela M.
AU - Rey Planellas, Sonia
AU - Roth, Bjørn
AU - Smith, Adrian
AU - Solberg, Lars Erik
AU - Stavrakidis‐Zachou, Orestis
AU - Stien, Lars Helge
AU - Striberny, Anja
AU - Svalheim, Ragnhild Aven
AU - Sæther, Bjørn‐Steinar
AU - Timmerhaus, Gerrit
AU - Toften, Hilde
AU - Tschirren, Linda
AU - van de Vis, Hans
AU - Ytteborg, Elisabeth
AU - Zena, Lucas A.
AU - Østbye, Tone‐Kari Knutsdatter
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 The Author(s). Reviews in Aquaculture published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.
PY - 2026/1/1
Y1 - 2026/1/1
N2 - Refining approaches to measuring, monitoring and appraising animal welfare in aquaculture research is key to (i) protecting and optimizing it, (ii) documenting the severity of how and when it deviates, and (iii) ensuring good scientific quality, reliable results and reproducibility, amongst other factors. However, different fish species and life stages can have varying welfare needs and assessing their welfare can be challenging. An array of welfare indicators (WIs) can be utilized when documenting fish welfare, and there is currently little consensus on which WIs are most applicable to the key fish species used in European aquaculture research. The aim of this review is to propose updated, fit for purpose and comprehensive WI toolboxes for aquaculture research involving Atlantic salmon ( Salmo salar ), rainbow trout ( Oncorhynchus mykiss ), European seabass ( Dicentrarchus labrax ), gilthead seabream ( Sparus aurata ), and the common carp ( Cyprinus carpio ). Where possible, these toolboxes will also include life‐stage considerations. It also provides information on utilizing WIs in deciding humane end‐points as well as information on how to sample different types of indicators. The review closes with information on how digitalization can affect the collection, collation and analysis of WI data in aquaculture research, including both practical and theoretical considerations. The toolboxes incorporate a range of WIs that go beyond those required for legally safeguarding fish welfare in both laboratory and operational experimental facilities in the current European 2010/63/EU Directive on the protection of animals used for scientific purposes and its amendment, the Commission Delegated Directive (EU) 2024/1262.
AB - Refining approaches to measuring, monitoring and appraising animal welfare in aquaculture research is key to (i) protecting and optimizing it, (ii) documenting the severity of how and when it deviates, and (iii) ensuring good scientific quality, reliable results and reproducibility, amongst other factors. However, different fish species and life stages can have varying welfare needs and assessing their welfare can be challenging. An array of welfare indicators (WIs) can be utilized when documenting fish welfare, and there is currently little consensus on which WIs are most applicable to the key fish species used in European aquaculture research. The aim of this review is to propose updated, fit for purpose and comprehensive WI toolboxes for aquaculture research involving Atlantic salmon ( Salmo salar ), rainbow trout ( Oncorhynchus mykiss ), European seabass ( Dicentrarchus labrax ), gilthead seabream ( Sparus aurata ), and the common carp ( Cyprinus carpio ). Where possible, these toolboxes will also include life‐stage considerations. It also provides information on utilizing WIs in deciding humane end‐points as well as information on how to sample different types of indicators. The review closes with information on how digitalization can affect the collection, collation and analysis of WI data in aquaculture research, including both practical and theoretical considerations. The toolboxes incorporate a range of WIs that go beyond those required for legally safeguarding fish welfare in both laboratory and operational experimental facilities in the current European 2010/63/EU Directive on the protection of animals used for scientific purposes and its amendment, the Commission Delegated Directive (EU) 2024/1262.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105022314105
U2 - 10.1111/raq.70109
DO - 10.1111/raq.70109
M3 - Review article
SN - 1753-5123
VL - 18
JO - Reviews in Aquaculture
JF - Reviews in Aquaculture
IS - 1
M1 - e70109
ER -