Abstract
The effects of written information of key sensory characteristics of apple cultivars on hedonic ratings and
willingness to pay (WTP) were measured in an experimental auction. Participants (n = 118, 95F, 23M,
mean age 37 y.) rated, in three subsequent rounds, pleasantness and WTP based on (1) appearance only
(n = 25), (2) appearance, written information and tasting (n = 44), or (3) appearance, tasting and written
information (n = 49). Four domestic cultivars were described as medium sour and crispy (‘Amorosa’), sour
and medium crispy (‘Konsta’), medium sweet and medium crispy (‘Lobo’) and sweet and medium crispy
(‘Tobias’). The differences between the cultivars in pleasantness and WTP were minimal when the evaluation
was based on appearance only. The effect of tasting after visual inspection was positive in three cultivars
and negative in one (‘Konsta’). Written information after tasting did not affect pleasantness or WTP.
For one cultivar (‘Tobias’), information given before tasting created expectations that were not fulfilled,
thus tasting decreased hedonic ratings and WTP. Mean WTP was 2.36 euro/kg. When pleasantness
increased by one point, WTP increased by 0.31–0.45 euro/kg. Regression models showed that pleasantness
explained 38–55% of WTP. Respondents who reported consuming domestic apples more often than
once a week had 0.52–0.74 euro/kg higher WTP than those who consumed them less frequently, suggesting
that familiarity with the product increases WTP. Results indicate that both written information and
tasting contribute to the ratings of pleasantness and WTP.
2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 97 - 105 |
Number of pages | 9 |
Journal | Food Quality and Preference |
Volume | 43 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Print publication - 2015 |
Keywords
- Apple
- BDM auction
- Hedonic ratings
- Information
- Willingness to pay