What can we learn from anthropological practice to conduct socially just participatory action research?

Steven Vella, Claudia Carter, Mark S. Reed*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

This paper explores the potential for using approaches and methods from anthropology to address inequalities and work with marginalised, voiceless groups to engage actively in decisions that affect them. We test and illustrate participatory action research (PAR) methods from anthropology that seek to understand tacit/implicit knowledge and values that may only be revealed through the study of day-to-day practices, behaviours and discourse over longer timescales. This is done through a case study of a planned development in Malta that included 170 interviews supported by situated listening and observation, observational visits over a period of time to the site and surrounding areas and public/stakeholder formal/informal meetings and workshops. Ethnographic methods helped build trust during the planning process, creating a communicative bridge for knowledge sharing. This qualitative research provided new insights based on tacit and implicit knowledge and values, highlighting specific subtleties, critical awareness, empathy and observational capacity, which are essential ingredients in socially just PAR. This included new insights into the way participation was shaped by broader socio-political contexts. By eliciting, analysing and integrating ‘knowledges’ in this way, action researchers can contribute to more socially equitable opportunities to participate and share power in knowledge creation.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-27
Number of pages27
JournalEducational Action Research
Early online date29 Mar 2021
DOIs
Publication statusFirst published - 29 Mar 2021

Keywords

  • Participatory Action Research
  • anthropological Practice
  • malta
  • social Impact Assessment

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'What can we learn from anthropological practice to conduct socially just participatory action research?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this