What is so positive about positive animal welfare? A critical review of the literature

Research output: Contribution to journalLiterature review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

It is claimed that positive animal welfare (PAW) developed over the last decade in reaction to animal welfare focusing too much on avoiding negatives. However, it remains unclear what PAW adds to the animal welfare literature and to what extent its ideas are new. Through a critical review of the PAW literature, we aim to separate different aspects of PAW and situate it in relation to the traditional animal welfare literature. We find that the core PAW literature is small (n = 10 papers) but links to wider areas of current research interest. The PAW literature is defined by four features: (1) positive emotions which is arguably the most widely acknowledged; (2) positive affective engagement which serves to functionally link positive emotions to goal-directed behavior; (3) quality of life which serves to situate PAW within the context of finding the right balance of positives over negatives; (4) happiness which brings a full life perspective to PAW. While the two first points are already part of welfare research going back decades, the two latter points could be linked to more recent research agendas concerning aggregation and how specific events may affect the ability of animals to make the best of their lives.
Original languageEnglish
Article number783
Number of pages19
JournalAnimals
Volume9
Issue number10
DOIs
Publication statusPrint publication - 11 Oct 2019

Fingerprint

Animal Welfare
animal welfare
emotions
Emotions
Research
Happiness
Aptitude
quality of life
Quality of Life

Keywords

  • Positive animal welfare
  • Critical review
  • Positive emotions
  • Positive affective engagement
  • Quality of life
  • Happiness

Cite this

@article{cbe774c5d22240d08c5ef1c9dac27e46,
title = "What is so positive about positive animal welfare? A critical review of the literature",
abstract = "It is claimed that positive animal welfare (PAW) developed over the last decade in reaction to animal welfare focusing too much on avoiding negatives. However, it remains unclear what PAW adds to the animal welfare literature and to what extent its ideas are new. Through a critical review of the PAW literature, we aim to separate different aspects of PAW and situate it in relation to the traditional animal welfare literature. We find that the core PAW literature is small (n = 10 papers) but links to wider areas of current research interest. The PAW literature is defined by four features: (1) positive emotions which is arguably the most widely acknowledged; (2) positive affective engagement which serves to functionally link positive emotions to goal-directed behavior; (3) quality of life which serves to situate PAW within the context of finding the right balance of positives over negatives; (4) happiness which brings a full life perspective to PAW. While the two first points are already part of welfare research going back decades, the two latter points could be linked to more recent research agendas concerning aggregation and how specific events may affect the ability of animals to make the best of their lives.",
keywords = "Positive animal welfare, Critical review, Positive emotions, Positive affective engagement, Quality of life, Happiness",
author = "AB Lawrence and Belinda Vigors and Peter Sandoe",
year = "2019",
month = "10",
day = "11",
doi = "10.3390/ani9100783",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
journal = "Animals",
issn = "2076-2615",
publisher = "MDPI",
number = "10",

}

What is so positive about positive animal welfare? A critical review of the literature. / Lawrence, AB; Vigors, Belinda; Sandoe, Peter.

In: Animals, Vol. 9, No. 10, 783, 11.10.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalLiterature review

TY - JOUR

T1 - What is so positive about positive animal welfare? A critical review of the literature

AU - Lawrence, AB

AU - Vigors, Belinda

AU - Sandoe, Peter

PY - 2019/10/11

Y1 - 2019/10/11

N2 - It is claimed that positive animal welfare (PAW) developed over the last decade in reaction to animal welfare focusing too much on avoiding negatives. However, it remains unclear what PAW adds to the animal welfare literature and to what extent its ideas are new. Through a critical review of the PAW literature, we aim to separate different aspects of PAW and situate it in relation to the traditional animal welfare literature. We find that the core PAW literature is small (n = 10 papers) but links to wider areas of current research interest. The PAW literature is defined by four features: (1) positive emotions which is arguably the most widely acknowledged; (2) positive affective engagement which serves to functionally link positive emotions to goal-directed behavior; (3) quality of life which serves to situate PAW within the context of finding the right balance of positives over negatives; (4) happiness which brings a full life perspective to PAW. While the two first points are already part of welfare research going back decades, the two latter points could be linked to more recent research agendas concerning aggregation and how specific events may affect the ability of animals to make the best of their lives.

AB - It is claimed that positive animal welfare (PAW) developed over the last decade in reaction to animal welfare focusing too much on avoiding negatives. However, it remains unclear what PAW adds to the animal welfare literature and to what extent its ideas are new. Through a critical review of the PAW literature, we aim to separate different aspects of PAW and situate it in relation to the traditional animal welfare literature. We find that the core PAW literature is small (n = 10 papers) but links to wider areas of current research interest. The PAW literature is defined by four features: (1) positive emotions which is arguably the most widely acknowledged; (2) positive affective engagement which serves to functionally link positive emotions to goal-directed behavior; (3) quality of life which serves to situate PAW within the context of finding the right balance of positives over negatives; (4) happiness which brings a full life perspective to PAW. While the two first points are already part of welfare research going back decades, the two latter points could be linked to more recent research agendas concerning aggregation and how specific events may affect the ability of animals to make the best of their lives.

KW - Positive animal welfare

KW - Critical review

KW - Positive emotions

KW - Positive affective engagement

KW - Quality of life

KW - Happiness

U2 - 10.3390/ani9100783

DO - 10.3390/ani9100783

M3 - Literature review

VL - 9

JO - Animals

JF - Animals

SN - 2076-2615

IS - 10

M1 - 783

ER -