Abstract
Recent legislative and other policy-related developments seek to enhance local agenda-setting
through empowered communities. However, community development is separated from community
empowerment, thus implicitly supporting a more uncritical perspective of empowerment
processes. In this article we: (1) focus on communities who do not engage; (2) identify
in-community sub-groups and differences as the norm rather than exception; (3) recognise the
backwards and forwards motion of community development processes; (4) identify the fluidity of
in-community interests and powers; and (5) recognise differences between individual and community-
level aspirations.We use evidence from a development project which targets communities
that do not engage. Based on interviews with the project manager, project officer, and 155 community
members, we conclude that: demoting capacity-building betrays an intrinsic and naı¨ve
belief in self-fulfilling processes of community empowerment, rather than acknowledgement of
complexities; there is a need, therefore, to remain sceptical in order that analyses are sensitive to
complexities of empowerment.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 320 - 338 |
Number of pages | 19 |
Journal | Local Economy |
Volume | 28 |
Issue number | 3 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Print publication - May 2013 |
Bibliographical note
1023361Keywords
- Community empowerment